Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library

2012-02-03 10:12:59
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library
From: "Bahnmiller, Bryan E." <bbahnmiller AT dtcc DOT com>
To: Len Boyle <len.boyle AT sas DOT com>, "Lightner, Jeff" <jlightner AT water DOT com>, "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:12:51 +0000

The ACSLS and SDLC type software (and possibly the ALMS) will handle cleaning differently than a TLD type robot. The problem with library based cleaning on a TLD robot is that the application software – NetBackup - is unaware that a drive is being cleaned. NetBackup can request a drive that is currently being cleaned. The library refuses the request because it is busy, so NetBackup downs the drive.

 

This happened to me quite a bit with the TLD type robots before using NetBackup cleaning. I had a robot that used to be very busy, and practically every morning we would have to “up” drives that had gone down because of this behavior.

 

 

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Len Boyle
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 9:00 AM
To: Lightner, Jeff; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library

 

That is interesting.

 

We found with the IBM 3584 tape library (also known as TS3500) with the ALMS feature turned on, the library has to be doing the cleaning.

 

We used to use a STK L700 with ACSLS  software for sharing the library between different Netbackup masters. We had issues and  found a NetBackup tech note that said with ACSLS one had to let the  library do the cleaning.

 

 

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 9:32 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library

 

The make and model are in the subject.

 

Quantum is specifically asking us to change to application based cleaning from robot based due to ongoing issue.   Also in reviewing NetBackup documentation it seems to suggest that robot based cleaning should not be used.

 


From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Len Boyle
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:09 PM
To: Lightner, Jeff; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library

 

What is the make and model of you tape library. A number of them require that the library do the tape drive cleaning.

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:17 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning tape setup Quantum i6000 Library

 

To set NetBackup cleaning as opposed to robot cleaning itself I gather we need to setup barcode rules as discussed in the following thread:

http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/cleaning-tape-cln

 

I’ve done that but am curious if they are correct about having to set HC2_CLN for HCART2 and HC_CLN for HCART?   We have a mix of LTO3 (which we have as HCART) and LTO5 (which we have as HCART2) but the cleaning tapes are “Universal” so would work in either drive type.  Do I really have to try to setup both HC_CLN and HC2_CLN?  It seemed to me that the HC_CLN and HC2_CLN were just to allow you to have 2 different kinds of cleaning tapes.

 

Additionally – I’ve disabled the robot’s automatic cleaning and moved the cleaning tapes from the special cleaning slots to the general slots.   Other than that and setting the barcode rules is there anything I need to do to enable NBU cleaning?

 

The drive cleaning frequency is set to 0 hours.  Is it correct to think this is appropriate because I want the cleaning to be based on “tape alerts” rather than frequency based on the recommendation I saw in the NBU help?

 

  

Jeffrey C. Lightner

Sr. UNIX Administrator

 

DS Waters of America, Inc.

5660 New Northside Drive NW

Suite 250

Atlanta, GA  30328

 

P: 678-486-3516

C: 678-772-0018

F: 770-937-7360

E: jlightner AT water DOT com

 

 

 

 

 

Athena®, Created for the Cause

Making a Difference in the Fight Against Breast Cancer

 

---------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------

 


_____________________________________________________________
DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu