I tried using the physical node name instead of the virtual and it has the same 
problems.  It also seems that the only problem directories are the larger ones 
that are shared out via the clusters.  I don't know if that is relavent.




Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> Right - my point was it may be "empty" directories because its not
> really on the virtual but rather on the underlying physical node.
> 


+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by steve.soto AT compucom DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu