Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Enterprise Backup software and hardware solutions

2010-05-28 07:56:18
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Enterprise Backup software and hardware solutions
From: "Shekel Tal" <Tal.Shekel AT uk.fujitsu DOT com>
To: <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:55:19 +0100
Depends on how much data you are backing up and what your retention
periods and backup window are?
I am a big fan of storagetek libraries and with LTO5 out now you can get
3TB on a single cart.

For you regions you may want to look at puredisk clients or perhaps a
NetApp filer in Manchester with ossv in your regions



-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of gboskin
Sent: 27 May 2010 07:43
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Enterprise Backup software and hardware solutions


I need help  with this all you backup gurus.. At the moment i have 20
sites running Replication EXEC 3.1 . Theres are being backed replicated
all over the conutry to the manchester office . The master manchester
servers has an MSA attachjed and then backed up to tape to a robot HP
6060.

the issue is that i have been asked to come out with a re-desgin
including hardware spec  for a new robot as the current one is 5 years
old and the MSA is about filling up ....


Any  ideas

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by ade.orimalade AT wspgroup DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>