Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] vault duplication issue

2009-12-01 11:56:28
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] vault duplication issue
From: "Michitsch, John" <JMICHITS AT gannett DOT com>
To: "ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com" <ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:56:23 -0500

 

Yes, all the full polices are set to the same retention.

 

From: ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com [mailto:ken_zufall AT goodyear DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:51 AM
To: Michitsch, John
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] vault duplication issue

 


Are all the retentions for the policies the same?  The only time I've seen multiple tape mounts myself is when the retentions on backups are different....

Ken Zufall
Technical Analyst
D660C
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
GTN 446.0592 or 330.796.0592


"Michitsch, John" <JMICHITS AT gannett DOT com>
Sent by: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

12/01/2009 11:42 AM

To

"VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU" <VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU>

cc

Subject

[Veritas-bu] vault duplication issue

 




Has anyone seen an issue with a vault profile where for every image to be duplicated a new tape is loaded?  We have multiple vault policies set up and they write all images in each batch to the same tape until the tape is full, then it loads a new tape.  We created a new profile the same way as the others.  This new profile appears to be changing tapes for each image in each batch job.  Has anyone seen this before?  It is a media server duping images off of a data domain appliance writing to an IBM 3494 library/3592 tape drive.
 
Thank you for any assistance. _______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>