Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog restore failing after upgrade to 6.5.4

2009-09-22 14:22:29
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog restore failing after upgrade to 6.5.4
From: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:16:20 -0500
Justin,

Thanks for your reply.

Your mention of the exact same error message being linked to a server with dual 
NIC's hit home because we have added an additional network interface to allow 
this server to communicate with our data domains over a private network.

We're looking into whether the different hostnames associated with these 
interfaces may be the problem.

Thanks for giving us some food for thought.

Mark Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
 please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to


-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:25 PM
To: Mark Glazerman
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog restore failing after upgrade to 6.5.4

Hi,

When you are recovering the catalog are you recovering it to the exact 
same location as you have on your existing master server?

1. if /usr/openv -> /mypartition
2. then on the restore server you have to have the same thing with the 
same hostname as well, or else it won't work.
3. Did you include the DR file as well?

But that failure looks a bit strange..

http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/total-meltdown-unablle-recover-nbdb

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/285935.htm

Etrack Incident = ET834802

Description:
    Catalog recovery from a hot catalog backup would fail with the 
following
    error when the entry for EMMSERVER in bp.conf was different than the
    SERVER name for the master server, but, they were actually the same
    machine.  This would occur when there were two NICs in the master server.
      "Failed to find last NBDB backup image record for client serverName
       with policy policyName (227)"

Has anything changed in your environment besides the 6.5.4 upgrade?

Justin.

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Mark Glazerman wrote:

> We upgraded to 6.5.4 about 4 months ago and have just started preparing
> for our first DR test at this version level (previous successful tests
> at 6.5.1).
>
>
>
> We have a support call open with datalink because we have so far been
> unable to restore our catalog to our test master server.
>
>
>
> The catalog restore (initiated with bprecover -wizard) restores all the
> client images (25GB or so) but pukes every time with the following
> error...
>
>
>
> 12:58:19.201 [13861] <16> bprecover: ERR - Failed to find last NBDB
> backup image record for client nbumaster01.sun.spartech.com with policy
> NBU_CATALOG_HOT (227)
>
>
>
> 12:58:19.221 [13861] <16> bprecover: Failed to recover catalog (227)
>
>
>
> Has anyone out there seen anything similar since upgrading to 6.5.4 ?
>
>
>
> As a point of reference our test master server is configured and patched
> exactly like our production box.
>
>
>
> Our worry is that besides issues in testing, we may have exposed a huge
> hole in our production restore capabilities with regard to a master
> server loss.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Mark Glazerman
>
> Enterprise Storage Administrator
>
> Spartech Corporation
>
> Desk: 314-889-8282
>
> Fax: 314-854-8282
>
> Cell: 618-520-3401
>
> mark.glazerman AT spartech DOT com <mailto:mark.glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
>
> http://www.spartech.com <http://www.spartech.com/>
>
> P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, are
> intended solely for the use of the addressee, and may be legally
> privileged. If you have received this email in error please notify the
> sender immediately, and do not copy or forward it.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu