Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Does NBU interpretation of TapeAlert do any good for anybody?

2009-02-25 17:42:36
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Does NBU interpretation of TapeAlert do any good for anybody?
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
To: "Rosenkoetter, Gabriel" <Gabriel.Rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:23:43 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel wrote:

> I've had a NO_TAPEALERT touch file in all environments I've taken care of 
> through several employers since the 4.5 days. I used to do that because the 
> only TapeAlert NetBackup paid attention to (minimally, at the time) was drive 
> cleaning, and I've always used libraries that were configured to take care of 
> that themselves.
>
> For a while now, in an environment I don't handle day to day for my current 
> employer, we've had a heap of frozen media turn up on a regular basis. 
> Because we're also short on media in that environment at the moment, I poked 
> around and saw many TapeAlert warnings and "critical" messages (from 9940B 
> drives, on an HP-UX 11.23 master/media server in both cases) related to the 
> frozen media, none of which could then be correlated back to an I/O failures. 
> In this environment, there was no NO_TAPEALERT touch file.
>
> To test things out, I removed the NO_TAPEALERT file in another environment, 
> where frozen tapes are much more rare (and usually because of a flipped r/w 
> switch or catalog data on an old tape that found its way back to the scratch 
> pool)... and immediately got about 12 frozen tapes over one night.
>
> What *appears* to be happening is that bptm finishes writing to a tape, 
> ejects the tape, checks for TapeAlerts on the drive, finds some (often, 
> drives that want to dump diags, which I believe requires a visit by 
> Sun/STK)... and responds by freezing the tape, even though nothing's actually 
> *wrong* with the tape.
>
> Am I doing something wrong with regard to managing my tape drives that all 
> these TapeAlerts are popping up?
>
> Am I missing some knob or dial somewhere to adjust what NBU/EMM/bptm decides 
> to do when it receives a TapeAlert of a particular type? (No, I'm not looking 
> for the MEDIA_ERROR_THRESHOLD of nbemmcmd: these "errors" are clearly not 
> errors, and they'll keep happening no matter how high I set that threshold. I 
> want them to just be ignored, while other, real, errors should still freeze 
> media.)
>
> For now, I'm just putting NO_TAPEALERT touchfiles in place in both 
> environments...
>
> --
> gabriel rosenkoetter
> Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer
> gabriel.rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz, 215 231 1556
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>

I use it, it cleans the tapes when the drives need it, works well.

Justin.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>