Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?

2008-08-21 08:58:43
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?
From: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
To: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>, <Bluejay AT fujigreenwood DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:41:54 -0500

We’re running 6.5.1 on a Solaris x86 master and apart from a ZFS issue (which was fixed with engineering binaries) we don’t have any ongoing problems.  6.5.2  and 6.5.2a seem to be releases that fixe lots of issues for some and create additional problems for others. 

 

Mark J

 

Mark Glazerman

Desk: 314-889-8282

Cell: 618-520-3401

P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:46 AM
To: Bluejay AT fujigreenwood DOT com
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?

 

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:04 AM, <Bluejay AT fujigreenwood DOT com> wrote:

Watch out for this one with 6.5.1 on Windows:

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301175.htm


The technote says that this is fixed in 6.5.2.

 

Right now I'm caught between that one and the completely broken 6.5.2A -
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/305609.htm


The technote says that there's an EEB available for this.  6.5.2A is *NOT completely broken.  Many years, us included, are running it in full production.

 

You'd think they'd test this stuff before release by ,say, trying to run a
backup or something...


This has been discussed before.  Your comment is unwarranted and low shots like this don't encourage Symantec employees or other users to help you.

.../Ed

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu