Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client
2008-08-19 14:08:50
There’s no harm in testing, thanks. I bet the server team will
check with me first next time. Yeah, right!
From: Clausen, Matt R
[EQ] [mailto:Matthew.R.Clausen AT Embarq DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:22 PM
To: Randy Samora; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 Client
I doubt it. The OS Compatibility Matrix says that for Windows 2008,
the minimum client is 6.5.2... Now, you MIGHT be able to use 6.5.1, but I doubt
it. I'm pretty sure that there will be code changes introduced with the 6.5.2
client that allows it to work under Windows 2008. If you have a dev-box around
somewhere though that's Windows 2008 you can try the 6.5.1 client there to see
if it works.
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Randy
Samora
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:54 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client
<Windows shop,
Windows servers and clients.>
I’m at 6.0 and was
really hoping to upgrade to 6.5.1 next week and not very anxious to go to 6.5.2
just yet from what I’m reading. The server team decided to start rolling
out 2008 Server servers without checking for compatibility so now I have
clients I can’t backup. Is there any other way besides upgrading to .2 to
resolve this?
Thanks,
Randy
|
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Migration 5.1 -> 6.5, WEAVER, Simon (external)
- [Veritas-bu] BMR 6.5.2 issue with Braodcom NetXtreme II chip, Mike Kiles
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client, WEAVER, Simon (external)
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client, Cornely, David
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client, Randy Samora
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client, WEAVER, Simon (external)
|
|
|