Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?
2008-06-28 00:13:37
Hi Folks,
I was in the NetBackup class this week, and just got another note for a bug within 6.5.2 and that will be fixed in coming 6.5.2A scheduled on July 13. Just Windows Master Servers are affected, in case if the backup policies have all_local_drives under selection, then after the upgrade any incremental backups for those policies will be run as full.
again, lesson learned, don't rush to apply any updates in the production, wait until it is fully tested. I am at 6.5.1 and wait for a while now...
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel < Gabriel.Rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz> wrote:
Not that I've seen yet (one week production in one environment,
upgraded the other today, a couple of weeks testing prior to that).
But I seem
to recall that your environments are larger and slightly more varied than
mine...
Even if there are bugs introduced, I felt compelled to upgrade for the
ability to do Exchange 2007 backups from the inactive CCR node rather than the
active one. That's a huge win.
Thanks Gabriel. Other than the hot catalog backup bug, are
there any other bugs in 6.5.2 that are not also there in 6.5.1? In other
words, should anything stop somebody from upgrading from 6.5.1 to
6.5.2? Thanks again, .../Ed
I know of a bug (and we
have engineering binaries to cover it both on the HP-UX master and on the
Win2k3 clients) specific to Win2k3 Active Directory servers (portions of the
SYSVOL cannot be restored).
So far as I know,
there's no bug report published on that as yet. That's been present since 6.5
and Symantec has told us they expect to include the fix in 6.5.4.
(This one's not
Windows-specific, it requires engineering binaries on both master and
client.)
--
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a
?
Can you be
more specific about "missing files during the restore process"?
Do you mean that you
run a restore and some data is missing? Is this file level data, or an
agent? If you have a specific test you did that failed, I'd like to
duplicate in my 6.5.2 environment.
-Jonathan
We're waiting on 6.5.2a for the windows side of the house as we are
experiencing a ton of issues with instability, errors and missing files during
the restore process.
Mark,
Is this with windows or UNIX as well ? My 6.5.2
Solaris 10 install seems to be running fine with some critical policies
listed.
Regards,
Dominik
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?
Jay,
The critical policies issue was raised by another member of
this mailing list a while ago but even after removing these from the policy,
the catalog will still fail every now and then. It appears to be an
issue with nbdbm database verification but they have been unable to debug it
yet. I hadn't heard of 6.5.2 until I talked with support
yesterday, hence my question.
Thanks
Mark Glazerman Desk:
314-889-8282 Cell: 618-520-3401
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, (continued)
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Mark Glazerman
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?,
Boris Kraizman <=
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Dominik Pietrzykowski
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone heard of 6.5.2a ?, Dominik Pietrzykowski
|
|
|