From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:10
PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup Manual Backup - can't see restore - OFFTOPIC
Funny that.
UNIX has been going to
“succumb” any day now ever since 1970.
NT was introduced specifically to try to
take the UNIX niche but failed in that attempt (however it did succeed in
taking over Novell’s fileserver niche). NT and subsequent
Windoze flavors failed because they are simply not scalable enough.
Interestingly the UNIX Clone, Linux, is
taking market share away from Windoze both in the desktop and the server arenas
to the point that Dell is selling laptops with Ubuntu now and has been selling
servers with RedHat for quite a while.
Using what were judged to be monopolistic
practices by the EU courts and were on there way to being done so by US courts
before W killed the DOJ anti-trust action doesn’t mean you were adopted
due to superior technology but rather due to unscrupulous business practices.
The great thing about UNIX/Linux is that
it does offer choice. SCO UNIX by the way was a good OS. What
killed it was a combination of free Linux and FreeBSD in the niche they were in
along with poor business practices. It had nothing to do with Windows as
most of its life was AFTER Windows was already available.
Now lets talk about Vista
which seems to be flying as high as your average lead balloon – so much
so that MicroSloth is actually starting to talk about “extending”
the life of XP.
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:38
PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup Manual Backup - can't see restore
Good - so when all the paltry
"UNIX" distributions finally succumb to the mighty Windows there
won't be any debate over what name to put on the tombstone.
Windows has market share, which is far more important than any standard.
If you think a recognized standard or some other piece of paper is going to
keep you in business then you had better go talk to SCO. In the mean
time, I'd keep selling solutions to people's problems. =P
-Jonathan
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:58
PM
To: Curtis Preston
Cc: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup Manual Backup - can't see restore
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Curtis Preston <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com> wrote:
After all these years, it still cracks me up that NetBackup calls Unix
"Standard," which makes Windows and all other platforms,
"non-standard."
So what's your point? :-)
Unix is a multi-vendor standard recognized by both ISO and IEEE. Windows
is not a standard from any standards body that I'm aware of. Even its
trademark is disputed in legal circles.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
If I've helped you, please make a donation to my favorite charity at http://firstgiving.com/edwilts
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------