Re: [Veritas-bu] question about restores in NB 6.5.x

As per my knowledge , there is no way we can set the priority on the restore jobs. Priority of restore jobs depends upon the sequence you initiate the restore.

Abhishek Dhingra

IBM Global Services, Delhi,
Email : abhishek.dhingra AT in.ibm DOT com
Mobile : +91-9818675370

rascal <rascal1981 AT gmail DOT com>
Sent by: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

24/04/08 09:34 AM

To	veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
cc
Subject	[Veritas-bu] question about restores in NB 6.5.x

Hello Netbackup Gurus,

So I thought I would toss this out and get some feedback.

As we all know, Netbackup automatically sets restore jobs to have the highest priority when placed into the queue, barring any changes to the configuration, acts of the unknown and just plain weird stuff.... That being said, we had a issue during a disaster recovery scenario where we had multiple restores running and fighting for resources. On top of that, we had to try and organize the restores in such a way that this restore runs first, followed by this one, than this one and so on (i.e. set a priority/order within the restore jobs). My question is that in my digging on google and symantec's site, I can't seem to find anything that would let me change the priority/order of multiple restore jobs; has anyone run into this and/or devised a method and/or has some tips on how they handle restores during a disaster recovery scenario in order to set priorities on what gets what resources and thus done first?

--
Matthew MCP, MCSA, MCTS, OCA
rascal1981 AT gmail DOT com

Define Trouble:
Why did you apply THAT patch??.... _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu