Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux Master Server

2008-04-09 17:05:28
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux Master Server
From: "Staub, Doug" <rstaub AT amgen DOT com>
To: Austin Murphy <austin.murphy AT gmail DOT com>, "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:47:29 -0700
Have only *heard* that Linux (RHEL 5 to be specific w/ autofs ver. 5) has 
addressed how automounter behaves with regard to backing up NFS shares...in 
RHEL 4 (autofs ver. 4), I have seen it behave inconsistently...could be we are 
overloading our Linux media servers, but Solaris (9, specifically) never has a 
problem.

I have seen our Linux media servers choke on NFS restores as well, where 
directing them through our Solaris 9 master server as the restore client for 
the same NFS restore works like a champ.

-Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Austin 
Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:31 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Linux Master Server

Does anyone have a reason *not* to use NetBackup on Linux as a
master/media server?  I've heard that Linux makes a great media
server, but how about a master?

My options are Solaris/SPARC and Linux/x86_64 and I was wondering if
anyone had found a concrete reason why Linux was inferior.

Thanks,
Austin
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>