Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Need some help

2007-10-17 16:10:35
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
To: "Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)" <dcruice AT deloitte DOT com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:54:17 -0400 (EDT)
There have been other issues reported on the list, I am running 6.0Mp5 in 
all environments without catalog compression, there are some other misc 
issues, but not any MAJOR issues.

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:

> NOT what I wanted to hear, we don't compress our catalog.  But if there
> are other issues, I'm up the creek without a paddle.  uggggggg
>
> Thanks
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:27 PM
> To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
>
> 6.0MP5 has problems if you use a compressed catalog and there are other
> issues as well.
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
>
>> Well...my issue is not resolved, I have gone to the extent of building
> a
>> new box with the same old media server name, and that STILL did not do
>> the trick.  Symantec is recommending I install MP5 on the Master node.
>> As they have seen this issue with other customers and MP5 seemed to
> have
>> done the trick.  So now I turn to my fella NBU friends are there any
>> gotcha's or issues with MP5 and does anyone know how long it has been
>> out?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:20 PM
>> To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
>> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
>>
>> That sounds right, do a test restore to make sure it works!
>>
>> Justin.
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
>>
>>> Old one back in is not an option.  Where do I put the
>>> Force_Restore_media_Server = OLD_Retiree new_server.
>> Remember...Master
>>> server is a W2K3 box.  If it goes in via the GUI of Host Properties
> of
>>> the Master...General Server...Media host override, then I did already
>>> enter them.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Dan
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:04 PM
>>> To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
>>> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
>>>
>>> Hm..
>>>
>>> Put the old one back and do it properly OR..
>>>
>>> Use:
>>>
>>> (workaround)
>>>
>>> FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER = old_retiree new_server
>>>
>>> Hmm, there are probably more options but those are the ones that
>>> immediately come to mind.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
>>>
>>>> I rebuilt two media servers and renamed one.  And no like a dope I
>> did
>>>> not following the "retiring the media server" whitepaper that
> Veritas
>>> so
>>>> gracefully wrote.  So now I have an issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My entire Master / media servers are Windows 2003 6.0 MP4.  The
> issue
>>> I
>>>> am having is getting all the media changed to the new media servers.
>>>> I've tried the:
>>>>
>>>> Bpmedia -movedb -ev media_ID -oldserver old_server newserver
>>> new_server
>>>> command and it seems to run fine, but when I do a bpmedialist the
>>> media
>>>> is still assigned to the old media server name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have an ideas?  I've gone as far as changing the display name
>>> on
>>>> the new media server to read the old server name, modified my host
>>> files
>>>> so the old name points to the new server's IP address and simply can
>>> not
>>>> get this figured out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The caveat is I have to retain all the images on all these tapes.
>>>> UGGGGG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan Cruice
>>>>
>>>> This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>>> information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
>>> protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
>>> delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
>>> copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
>>> based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
> delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
> based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>