Scott,
The 2003 server should be protecting the
shadow copy components not the system state which is for Windows 2000. As for
the other performance my first suggestion is to check the NIC setting. If GigE
then auto negotiate is acceptable; however, if 100Mbps Ethernet is used force
the NIC to 100 FULL duplex. The C:\ drive, especially the Windows directory
will always be a pain from a speed and feed perspective, but not to the limits
you’re seeing. Lastly, set the virus scan to scan inbound only, using
the outbound on a backup is a performance hit no one wants to experience.
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win.
You're obligated to keep trying to do the best you can every day. Marian
Wright Edelman
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Deiter, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007
3:44 PM
To:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Very slow
client
We are running 5.1 mp4 across the board
with a solaris 9 master media a few other media servers and numerous solaris
and windows clients.
on the master/media we just added a
windows 2003 client only for system state backups.
we cancelled these attempts because of
performance. Less than 10K/sec Yes I mean Kilobytes.
So we tried this in a test policy to
backup the c drive. Same result.
ftp is moving at 2-3 meg/sec
bpgetconfig and bpclntcmd all look and
feel normal.
The client softwhere was removed and
reinstalled. open file backup disabled tracker disabled.
Where else do I look for the bottleneck?
Scott
Deiter
System Administrator
Hanover
Direct, Inc.
Hanover, PA
Voice: 717-633-3298
Fax: 717-633-3101
