Jason
Are you backing up the "Physical" computer names? 

Lets say your computer server names are NODE1 and NODE2

The Virtual Server Name is VIRTUAL1

What I do, is have a policy for the 2 cluster nodes, backup C:, shadow copy,
and any other local drives

There is another policy for the VIRTUAL1 Server which backs up the data

As a rule, I do not use local drives

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver AT Astrium.eads DOT net



-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Leidy, 
Jason
D
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:32 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Martin, Jonathan; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)


I backup ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES on a few of our clusters, it gets everything. For
instance, I'll put both physical nodes that host the cluster in a policy
that uses the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES option. I'm new to the backup world, is this
not the best practice? It gets the quorum and everything (I'm able to
restore the data).

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 7:23 AM
To: 'Martin, Jonathan'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)

NetBackup has to be treated differently on clusters - it needs to run on the
virtual server that hosts the volume group and you can't do an
ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES policy on a cluster.  With FlashBackups, you also need to
make sure that the snapshot volume is a member of the disk group or your
disk group could fail over to another node and leave the snapshot volume
behind.

This is no different on a Windows cluster than it is on a Veritas cluster.
Only VMS clusters get it right since they have a cluster-wide file system.

        .../Ed

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love:
http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:43 AM
> To: Ed Wilts; ida3248b AT post.cybercity DOT dk; veritas-
> bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)
> 
> 
> Netbackup isn't installed as a clustered resource.  It runs on all
> nodes independent of one another. Why would cluster configuration be 
> any different then a plain build on Windows?
> 
> -Jonathan
> 

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do 
not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or 
disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments 
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email 
transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu