Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51

2006-09-15 09:11:29
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51
From: imran_khan at symantec.com (Imran Khan)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:11:29 +0100
Thanks

Imran

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
veritas-bu-request at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: 15 September 2006 13:10
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51

Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        veritas-bu-request at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        veritas-bu-owner at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. (no subject) (mirko_nbu at mac.com)
   2. Re: (no subject) (WEAVER, Simon)
   3. Re: Command for finding out witch files are       notbeingback-up
      with status code 1 (Edwin Bader)
   4. Re: BackupExec (J K)
   5. Re: Command for finding out witch files are       notbe
ingback-up
      with status code 1 (WEAVER, Simon)
   6. Re: BackupExec (WEAVER, Simon)
   7. Re: LTO3 performance (Ed Wilts)
   8. Re: Command for finding out witch files   are     notbe
ingback-up
      with status code 1 (Clooney, David)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:55:13 +0200
From: mirko_nbu at mac.com
Subject: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <5250101.1158306913104.JavaMail.mirko_nbu at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi experts, 

a customer of mine is unsing NetBackup 6.0 on a Windows 2003 platform
as it's central backup/recovery infrastructure. A FC attached library 
with 3x LTO3 drives is used for storing the data. For better
backup/restore
performance, a disk staging area is used! 

Unfortunately, the customer only gets about 20Mb/s performance when
storing 
it's staging area to tape. As far as I know, a LTO3 can deliver round
about 60-70Mb/s 
and starts streaming at about 30-35Mb/s... anyone with the same setup
can give 
some suggestions? 

Buffer sizes are already properly configured... 

Thanks a lot! 


Cheers, 

Mirko


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:07:39 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)
To: "'mirko_nbu at mac.com'" <mirko_nbu at mac.com>,
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        
<06F68E0112FAD611839400508BAF1B33091952DE at mms12032.pth.uk.astrium.corp>
        
Content-Type: text/plain


Mirko

Ok, well maybe we can compare things here, because I have been using
DSU's
to an HP EVA over fiber, and to be truthful, the throughput is pants !!!
In
fact, writing to LTO3 is BETTER than disk.

I do think that writing to disks has been a poor experience for me, and
its
something I may not return to, because I cannot see where I am going
wrong!!

Things to look at on the client:

1) If AV is running, turn it off
2) If any Disk defrag / maintenance is taking place on the Server (Disk
tune-ups, I/O other than backups), turn off
3) If Tracker.exe is running on the client, turn it off.
4) verify that the correct STU is being used for tape backups
5) What type of files are being backed up? Small files are still no good
(even on fiber its poor).

Over fiber for a server will SMALL files, a 60GB partition can take
around
1:30 - 2 hours over LAN Network direct to fiber attached LTO3 Drives.

2TB of Data on a SAN Media Server takes between 4 - 10 hours (sometimes
the
last stream can take 10 hours, again its mainly a lot of small files on
here).

HTH - gives some ideas and suggestions. I do NOT use 6.0 as it's a
little
buggy (Talk to Ed, he can go into details on this!).

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net



-----Original Message-----
From: mirko_nbu at mac.com [mailto:mirko_nbu at mac.com] 
Sent: 15 September 2006 08:55
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)


Hi experts, 

a customer of mine is unsing NetBackup 6.0 on a Windows 2003 platform as
it's central backup/recovery infrastructure. A FC attached library 
with 3x LTO3 drives is used for storing the data. For better
backup/restore
performance, a disk staging area is used! 

Unfortunately, the customer only gets about 20Mb/s performance when
storing 
it's staging area to tape. As far as I know, a LTO3 can deliver round
about
60-70Mb/s 
and starts streaming at about 30-35Mb/s... anyone with the same setup
can
give 
some suggestions? 

Buffer sizes are already properly configured... 

Thanks a lot! 


Cheers, 

Mirko
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:36:15 +0200
From: "Edwin Bader" <edwin.bader at interoute.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
        notbeingback-up with status code 1
To: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>, "Martin,
Jonathan
        \(Contractor\)" <JMARTI05 at intersil.com>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<AB8390177F7F204C91B8CAB4A4E5AB55019923E8 at ex002.uk.mis.vianetworks.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thanks Simon I will try that, all the logging levels are default I
suppose?

  _____  

From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:46 AM
To: Edwin Bader; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


Well here, just tried on one client, and its reporting back the files
its skipped.
 
Also went to BPERROR from a command line, and that provided a much more
in-depth look at the errors for a client.
 
You could also try this perhaps.
 
HTH
 

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Edwin Bader [mailto:edwin.bader at interoute.com] 
        Sent: 14 September 2006 16:08
        To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files
are notbeingback-up with status code 1
        
        
        When I run this against a client it only reports back "backup
of client NLP100007-15 exited with status 1 (the requested operation was
partially successful)
         
         
         

  _____  

        From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
        Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PM
        To: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader;
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files
are notbeingback-up with status code 1
        
        
        Jonathan
        Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool
goes into more details about every file.
         
        HTH

        Regards

        Simon Weaver
        3rd Line Technical Support
        Windows Domain Administrator 

        EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
        Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

        Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
[mailto:JMARTI05 at intersil.com] 
                Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36
                To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch
files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
                
                
                In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the
details its in that log there.  Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32
log?  I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot
easier than parsing log files.)
                 
                -Jonathan

  _____  

                From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Edwin
Bader
                Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AM
                To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch
files are not beingback-up with status code 1
                
                
                Gents,
                 
                 
                Several customers are asking witch files are not being
backed up when the status code is 1.
                 
                Is there a way to retrieve this info?
                 
                 
                 
                Cheers,
                 
                Edwin
                 

                

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060915/
99c84dd1/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:46:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: "J K" <m5644 at abc.se>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] BackupExec
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <8106.213.115.53.133.1158310002.squirrel at www.abc.se>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8

We've got version 4.5 of NetBackup client and all the parts were
purchased at the same time. I don't have the software package at hand
where I'm now so I can't tell the exact version number of BackupExec.

We're running Windows 2000 Server.

BR  Johan Kullberg


> BE will be "simpler" - is the little brother to the big brother of
NBU.
>
> Also, what version is it and what is your Windows version. An out of
date
> BE
> may not be compatible with some of the features of your Windows OS :-)
>



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:46:49 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
        notbe   ingback-up with status code 1
To: "'Edwin Bader'" <edwin.bader at interoute.com>,     "Martin,
Jonathan
        (Contractor)" <JMARTI05 at intersil.com>,
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        
<06F68E0112FAD611839400508BAF1B33091952E5 at mms12032.pth.uk.astrium.corp>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


I am not sure if you can change them - try the command with a /? for
Windows
users
 
It may or may not help - just an alternative that activity monitor and
the
reports module :-)
 
 

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email:  <mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net>
Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Edwin Bader [mailto:edwin.bader at interoute.com] 
Sent: 15 September 2006 09:36
To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


Thanks Simon I will try that, all the logging levels are default I
suppose?

  _____  

From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:46 AM
To: Edwin Bader; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


Well here, just tried on one client, and its reporting back the files
its
skipped.
 
Also went to BPERROR from a command line, and that provided a much more
in-depth look at the errors for a client.
 
You could also try this perhaps.
 
HTH
 

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email:  <mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net>
Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Edwin Bader [mailto:edwin.bader at interoute.com] 
Sent: 14 September 2006 16:08
To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


When I run this against a client it only reports back "backup  of client
NLP100007-15 exited with status 1 (the requested operation was partially
successful)
 
 
 

  _____  

From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PM
To: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader;
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


Jonathan
Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool goes into
more details about every file.
 
HTH

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email:  <mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net>
Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:JMARTI05 at intersil.com] 
Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36
To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are
notbeingback-up with status code 1


In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in
that
log there.  Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log?  I'm not 100%
sure
because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log
files.)
 
-Jonathan

  _____  

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Edwin
Bader
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not
beingback-up with status code 1


Gents,
 
 
Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when
the
status code is 1.
 
Is there a way to retrieve this info?
 
 
 
Cheers,
 
Edwin
 



This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium
Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium
Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        



This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060915/
9c33dbd8/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:47:36 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] BackupExec
To: "'J K'" <m5644 at abc.se>, veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        
<06F68E0112FAD611839400508BAF1B33091952E6 at mms12032.pth.uk.astrium.corp>
        
Content-Type: text/plain


Ok 4.5 for windows is fine.

You can check the system requirments for BE on the symantec.com web site
:-)

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net



-----Original Message-----
From: J K [mailto:m5644 at abc.se] 
Sent: 15 September 2006 09:47
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] BackupExec


We've got version 4.5 of NetBackup client and all the parts were
purchased
at the same time. I don't have the software package at hand where I'm
now so
I can't tell the exact version number of BackupExec.

We're running Windows 2000 Server.

BR  Johan Kullberg


> BE will be "simpler" - is the little brother to the big brother of 
> NBU.
>
> Also, what version is it and what is your Windows version. An out of 
> date BE may not be compatible with some of the features of your 
> Windows OS :-)
>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:56:31 -0500
From: Ed Wilts <ewilts at ewilts.org>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO3 performance
To: mirko_nbu at mac.com
Cc: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <450A94EF.1040106 at ewilts.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

On 9/15/2006 2:55 AM, mirko_nbu at mac.com wrote:

> a customer of mine is unsing NetBackup 6.0 on a Windows 2003 platform
> as it's central backup/recovery infrastructure. A FC attached library 
> with 3x LTO3 drives is used for storing the data. For better
backup/restore
> performance, a disk staging area is used! 
> 
> Unfortunately, the customer only gets about 20Mb/s performance when
storing 
> it's staging area to tape. As far as I know, a LTO3 can deliver round
about 60-70Mb/s 
> and starts streaming at about 30-35Mb/s... anyone with the same setup
can give 
> some suggestions? 
> 
> Buffer sizes are already properly configured... 

We still don't have ours performing well yet, but make sure that the 
disk staging fragment size is unlimited and do some testing with the 
tape fragment size (we're currently using 20GB).

If you do find the magic turbo button, I'd sure appreciate hearing about

it.  We sometimes get over 60 or 70MB/sec from some of our clients 
(we've got a flashbackup client that writes directly to tape through a 
media server that fast), but many of the destaging jobs go a lot slower 
even from hardware that should be able to keep up (e.g. Sun V490).

        .../Ed
-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:09:24 +0100
From: "Clooney, David" <david.clooney at bankofamerica.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files   are
        notbe   ingback-up with status code 1
To: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>, "Edwin Bader"
        <edwin.bader at interoute.com>, "Martin, Jonathan
\(Contractor\)"
        <JMARTI05 at intersil.com>,
<veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<6A334D121100454D9D2AE91349CA00C5039D8EAD at EMACROEXC00V1.emea.bankofameri
ca.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What you need to do is 
 
bperror -problems -client $client -d mm/dd/yyyy (start time ) -e
mm/dd/yyyy (end time) -U
 
Start and end time being either side of when the backup took place .
 
If there was an error code 1 (partial sucess) then netbackup will have a
record of it is is still in the error DB
 
Regards
 
Dave

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon
Sent: 15 September 2006 11:47
To: 'Edwin Bader'; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbe
ingback-up with status code 1


I am not sure if you can change them - try the command with a /? for
Windows users
 
It may or may not help - just an alternative that activity monitor and
the reports module :-)
 
 

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Edwin Bader [mailto:edwin.bader at interoute.com] 
        Sent: 15 September 2006 09:36
        To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files
are notbeingback-up with status code 1
        
        
        Thanks Simon I will try that, all the logging levels are default
I suppose?

________________________________

        From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
        Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:46 AM
        To: Edwin Bader; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files
are notbeingback-up with status code 1
        
        
        Well here, just tried on one client, and its reporting back the
files its skipped.
         
        Also went to BPERROR from a command line, and that provided a
much more in-depth look at the errors for a client.
         
        You could also try this perhaps.
         
        HTH
         

        Regards

        Simon Weaver
        3rd Line Technical Support
        Windows Domain Administrator 

        EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
        Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

        Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Edwin Bader [mailto:edwin.bader at interoute.com] 
                Sent: 14 September 2006 16:08
                To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch
files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
                
                
                When I run this against a client it only reports back
"backup  of client NLP100007-15 exited with status 1 (the requested
operation was partially successful)
                 
                 
                 

________________________________

                From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
                Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PM
                To: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader;
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch
files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
                
                
                Jonathan
                Actually, that is not always the case, because the
Report tool goes into more details about every file.
                 
                HTH

                Regards

                Simon Weaver
                3rd Line Technical Support
                Windows Domain Administrator 

                EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
                Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

                Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
[mailto:JMARTI05 at intersil.com] 
                        Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36
                        To: Edwin Bader;
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                        Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding
out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
                        
                        
                        In the windows GUI if you click on the job and
go to the details its in that log there.  Alternately I think its in the
BPKAR32 log?  I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI
(its a lot easier than parsing log files.)
                         
                        -Jonathan

________________________________

                        From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Edwin
Bader
                        Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AM
                        To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                        Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out
witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1
                        
                        
                        Gents,
                         
                         
                        Several customers are asking witch files are not
being backed up when the status code is 1.
                         
                        Is there a way to retrieve this info?
                         
                         
                         
                        Cheers,
                         
                        Edwin
                         

                        

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        



Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060915/
057e418c/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51
*****************************************




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 5, Issue 51, Imran Khan <=