Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL

2006-08-02 07:58:57
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
From: briandiven at northwesternmutual.com (briandiven AT northwesternmutual DOT com)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:58:57 -0500
or Diligent, STK, IBM, Copan Systems, etc.

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu on behalf of Jim Horalek
Sent: Tue 8/1/2006 5:23 PM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL


Unfortunately no one has answered Juan's question.
Any Data Domain, Reo, Septon, Falcon Stor users out there?
 
Jim

        -----Original Message-----
        From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
        Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:52 PM
        To: briandiven at northwesternmutual.com; HallC at sec.gov; veritas-bu 
at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
        
        
        Some VTL products' de-duplication technology is eons beyond 
compression, with low level pattern matching, etc, etc, enabling upt to 25:1 
effective "compression".
         
        VTL allows you to pool disk on a single VTL that can be shared to 
multiple media servers as virtual tape drives, whereas DSSU cannot be shared, 
so you must pre determine how many jobs per storage unit/media server you will 
run in a given night, and allocate the appropriate amount of disk per media 
server.
         
        if you have an operations group that is accustomed to tape, it 
maintains the tape paradigm they're familiar with.
         
        VTLs can be clustered, so you can have a second VTL at a second site, 
replicated over IP, without getting into duplication, vaulting, or any sort of 
DR copy within the backup app.
         
        other stuff, but I'm outta here for the day, and that's all that on the 
top of my mind at the moment.
        :o)
         
        Paul
         
         
        -- 

                -----Original Message-----
                From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of briandiven 
at northwesternmutual.com
                Sent: August 1, 2006 3:30 PM
                To: HallC at sec.gov; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
                Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
                
                
                I guess this begs the question to the audience and the people 
that have put in VTL's ... what problems does a VTL solve that D2D can not?  
                 
                I think the list so far is:
                 
                1.  Administration is easier
                2.  Possibly performance
                3.  Compression (1/2 the disk of D2D)
                4.  I can use it to stress test a new NBU release
                 
                Anything else?


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Northwestern Mutual. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be 
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail and any 
attachments is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
notify Northwestern Mutual immediately by returning it to the sender and delete 
all copies from your system. Please be advised that communications received via 
the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center are secure. Communications that 
are not received via the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center may not be 
secure and could be observed by a third party. Thank you for your cooperation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060802/200fc075/attachment.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>