Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Expiring copy 1 images

2006-07-31 03:01:11
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Expiring copy 1 images
From: simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net (WEAVER, Simon)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:01:11 +0100
Question: If I am missing something here, but I have never had to use the
-deassignempty when a tape expires either using BPEXPDATE or just expire
through NetBackup on its own accord (ie: automatically expire when the
retention period date is reached)

Thanks

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net



-----Original Message-----
From: smpt [mailto:smpt at peppas.gr]
Sent: 29 July 2006 17:14
To: Liddle, Stuart; WEAVER, Simon; 'Mansell, Richard';
veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Expiring copy 1 images


yes , you are right
My problem is that I have to run at least ones per day a script that will
find all empty media and run the bpexpdate -deassignempty command

But in an environment that has 150GB of image database and more than 2000
tapes it is a problem. Imagine that the bpmedia -movedb or the bpexpdate
command takes more than 15 min to complete.

smpt

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Liddle, Stuart <liddles at amgen.com>
>  Subject: [Veritas-bu] Expiring copy 1 images
>  Sent: 29 Jul '06 18:00
> 
>  When you expire all of the images on a tape (virtual or otherwise)
> you have  to follow it up with this command:
> 
>  bpexpdate -deassignempty
> 
>  This will then set the status of the tape(s) to Available.
> 
>  A useful tip for expiring images is to look at the output from
bpimagelist
>  -l
> 
>  If you look at:??http://support.veritas.com/docs/193085
> 
>  It will give a full description of the rather messy outpuf from this 
> command.??Anyway, I put together an awk snippet to get just the
> information  out that I needed:
> 
>  bpimagelist -l -hoursago 999 | awk '($1??== "IMAGE"){print $6,
> "Primary:  "$28, "Copies: "$21,"Frags: "$22, "KB: "$19, $7, $11, $14}'
> 
>  Now you can use this output to look for whatever you want based upon
> the  following
> 
>  Primary: 1 Copies: 1 -- an image that has not yet been dup'd
>  Primary: 1 Copies: 2 -- an image that has been dup'd, but the 
> primary image is still copy 1
>  Primary: 2 Copies: 2 -- an image that has been dup'd with the 
> primary image as copy 2
>  Primary: 2 Copies: 1 -- an image that has been dup'd, primary image 
> is copy 2, & copy 1 has been expired  there are other variations on
> this, but you get the idea
> 
>  I look for something like "Primary: 2 Copies: 2" and then use the
> backupid  (first field of my awk output) to expire copy 1 like this:
> 
>  bpexpdate -backupid <backupid> -d 0 -copy 1 -force
> 
>  The "-copy 1" part is important....if you leave this out it will
> expire all  of the images....probably not a good idea.
> 
>  The last column in the awk output is the timestamp which may be
> useful if  you decide that you want to leave the copy 1 image around
> for a set amount  of time.??(Remember this can be converted to
> human-readable format by using  the command:??bpdbm -ctime <timestamp>??
> ).
> 
> 
>  --stuart
> 
>  _________________________
>  Stuart W. Liddle
>  Amgen Corp.
>  liddles at amgen.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: smpt [mailto:smpt at peppas.gr]
>  Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 1:04 AM
>  To: Liddle, Stuart; WEAVER, Simon; 'Mansell, Richard'; 
> veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>  Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiplexing
> 
>  Can you share your script?
> 
>  I'm using the same technique but there is a problem with tape
> expiration.  When you expire all images of one tape the tape doesn't
> expire.  You have to search for assigned tapes that they don't have
> media and then  you have to use the bpexpdate - jusmedia command to
> expire the tape.
> 
>  smpt
> 
> 
>  >??-------Original Message-------
>  >??From: Liddle, Stuart <liddles at amgen.com>
>  >??Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiplexing
>  >??Sent: 28 Jul '06 20:36
>  >
>  >??That's good for backup speeds, but it sucks for restores.??Unless all
>  > of??your clients have really slow network connections, having a high??
>  > multiplexing value is not really a good idea.
>  >??
>  >??You might want to consider dropping the multiplexing down to
>  > something like??6.
>  >??
>  >??Our configuration uses VTL's to our first backup copy and then I use
>  > vault??to put it to physical tape.??I multiplex to the VTL and
>  > single-stream to the??physical tapes.??Once it is on the physical
>  > tape, we have a script that will??bpexpdate the copy 1 image on the
>  > VTL (this is not an automatic option in??NetBackup until version 6.x).
>  >??
>  >??When you do a restore from a physical tape, you have a single-stream
>  > copy??and not one that is multiplexed....this makes for a faster
restore.
>  >??
>  >??--stuart
>  >??
>  >??-----Original Message-----
>  >??From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>  >??[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
>  > WEAVER,??Simon
>  >??Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:22 PM
>  >??To: 'Mansell, Richard'; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>  >??Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiplexing
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??Richard
>  >??Yes I use multiplexing a lot
>  >??
>  >??NBU 5.1 Master MP2 + 2 SAN Media Servers
>  >??
>  >??4 drives in a robot - using SSO
>  >??
>  >??1 Storage Unit set to multiplex 25 jobs per drive (Master)
>  >??2 SAN Storage Units set to use 2 drives, multiplex 8 per drive
>  >??
>  >??Seems to work - get a lot of jobs done - around 300 per night if that
>  helps.
>  >??
>  >??Regards
>  >??
>  >??Simon Weaver
>  >??3rd Line Technical Support
>  >??Windows Domain Administrator
>  >??
>  >??EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
>  >??Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
>  >??
>  >??Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??-----Original Message-----
>  >??From: Mansell, Richard [mailto:Richard.Mansell at ccc.govt.nz]
>  >??Sent: 27 July 2006 22:31
>  >??To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>  >??Subject: [Veritas-bu] Multiplexing
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??We are struggling to get all of the backups run during the backup
>  > window and??one of the obvious solutions is to start using
>  > multiplexing as the tape??drives are not being driven at any where near
>  their maximum throughput.
>  >??There has been a rather nasty multiplexing problem fixed in 6.0 MP3
>  > but I??would be interested to do a straw poll of how many people are
>  > using??multiplexing and if possible any issues encountered.
>  >??
>  >??I would appreciate it if you would respond (off list) as to whether
>  > you use??multiplexing or not (any version of NetBackup). I will
>  > summarise the results??and post back to the list.
>  >??
>  >??Regards
>  >??
>  >??Richard
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??
>  > **********************************************************************
>  >??This electronic email and any files transmitted with it are intended??
>  > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
>  >??
>  >??The views expressed in this message are those of the individual??
>  > sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Christchurch
>  > City??Council.
>  >??
>  >??If you are not the correct recipient of this email please advise the
>  > sender??and delete.
>  >??
>  >??Christchurch City Council
>  >??http://www.ccc.govt.nz
>  >??
>  > **********************************************************************
>  >??
>  >??
>  >??_______________________________________________
>  >??Veritas-bu maillist??-??Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu??
>  > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>  >??
>  >??This email is for the intended addressee only.
>  >??If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
>  > disseminate??or otherwise deal with it.
>  >??Please notify the sender by return email.
>  >??The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of
>  > Astrium??Limited.
>  >??Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or??
>  > obligation.
>  >??
>  >??Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259??
>  > Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1
>  > 2AS,??England??_______________________________________________
>  >??Veritas-bu maillist??-??Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu??
>  > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>  >??_______________________________________________
>  >??Veritas-bu maillist??-??Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu??
>  > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>  >??
> 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium 
Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>