Ed / Guys
Would tend to agree - I must admit we attempted to go to 6.0 and
unfortunately although the process should be simple, it was a complete pile
of rubbish!

My feeling is, if you have had ANY bad Database or Image DB images, expect
to see problems !!

Is it really me, or is 6.0 just badly "rushed out" ?

Ed - I for one am sticking with MP2 5.1 - its been very very stable, rock
solid and well put together.

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net



-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org] 
Sent: 30 June 2006 12:31
To: Tristan Ball
Cc: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?


On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:14:49PM +1000, Tristan Ball wrote:
> And I have to say that 5.1mp2+ is a lot more reliable than 6.0mp?, 
> especially when it comes to the scheduler.

That's a significant understatement.  6.0mp2's scheduler, even with
engineering patch bundles, has major issues.  We've been working them with
backline engineering support ever since we upgraded a few weeks ago.  Unless
you really, really *need* 6.0, stay away for now.

        .../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org _______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England