[Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?
2006-06-30 07:30:56
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Typical success rates? |
From: |
ewilts at ewilts.org (Ed Wilts) |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:30:56 -0500 |
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:14:49PM +1000, Tristan Ball wrote:
> And I have to say that 5.1mp2+ is a lot more reliable than 6.0mp?,
> especially when it comes to the scheduler.
That's a significant understatement. 6.0mp2's scheduler, even with
engineering patch bundles, has major issues. We've been working them
with backline engineering support ever since we upgraded a few weeks
ago. Unless you really, really *need* 6.0, stay away for now.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, Whelan, Patrick
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, WEAVER, Simon
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, WEAVER, Simon
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, Tristan Ball
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?,
Ed Wilts <=
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, WEAVER, Simon
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, Tristan Ball
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, WEAVER, Simon
- [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?, Weber, Philip
|
|
|