Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 12:20:56
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]
From: pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca (Paul Keating)
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:20:56 -0400
--XmKe.44bVTJFC0.6LEO8.DAWFdnk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
content-class: urn:content-classes:message

I don't believe your words were taken out of context, as even re-reading
your follow-up, I'm interpretting your words the same way.

I think you are misunderstanding what netbackup does...it DOES NOT mix
retentions on a single media...

If for instance you have one pool, named "netbackup" and you have 3
different policies, each with different retentions

Ie.
PolicyA -> FULL=3D4 weeks, INC=3D2 weeks -> pool=3Dnetbackup
PolicyB -> FULL=3D8 weeks, INC=3D4 weeks -> pool=3Dnetbackup
PolicyB -> FULL=3D24 weeks, INC=3D4 weeks -> pool=3Dnetbackup

You will ned up with something simlar to the following:

MediaID Pool            Retention
000001  Netbackup       24 weeks
000001  Netbackup       24 weeks
000001  Netbackup       24 weeks
000001  Netbackup       24 weeks



--=20


> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu=20
> [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of=20
> Dave Markham
> Sent: April 26, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: bob944 AT attglobal DOT net
> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]
>=20
>=20
> I think that my words have been taken out of context. I know you cant
> and shouldn't mix retentions on media which is why i find it hard that
> people use 1 media pool for all backups. From that i would assume they
> have the same retention for all backups. This in my opinion which is
> only my opinion is a bad idea.
>=20
> To give advise to the original thread i was saying that one=20
> volume pool
> for all backups is perhaps not the right way to do things and i was
> surprised by the number of people who seemed to adopt it.  I=20
> asked about
> mixed retentions as people with 1 volume pool cannot ( safely ) then
> have a full backup with a different retention than say a=20
> cumulative backup.
--XmKe.44bVTJFC0.6LEO8.DAWFdnk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

La version fran=C3=A7aise suit le texte anglais.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the =
Bank of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying=
 of this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediat=
ely from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so.=20

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------

Le pr=C3=A9sent courriel peut contenir de l'information privil=C3=A9gi=C3=
=A9e ou confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute dif=
fusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient pa=
r une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires d=C3=A9sign=C3=A9s est interdite=
 Si vous recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer imm=C3=A9diatement et envoyer=
 sans d=C3=A9lai =C3=A0
l'exp=C3=A9diteur un message =C3=A9lectronique pour l'aviser que vous avez =
=C3=A9limin=C3=A9 de votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel re=C3=A7u.

--XmKe.44bVTJFC0.6LEO8.DAWFdnk--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>