This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 004C6CC58625707E_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote on 09/15/2005 05:29:01 PM:
> 
> That sounds like an odd way of doing it.  Why did you take this
> approach?

Each DSSU only writes to one tape drive. I have two tape drives. In order 
to write to two tape drives at once, i need two separate DSSU. I don't 
think a Storage Unit Group would fix that limitation.

I also have a daily and monthly volume pool. The daily policy has the 
Storage unit set to either daily-drive1 or daily-drive2. The final 
destination for the Daily DSSU is Daily volume pool(similarly for the 
monthend).

That's how i came up with 4.

--=_alternative 004C6CC58625707E_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2><tt>Ed Wilts &lt;ewilts AT ewilts DOT org&gt; wrote on 
09/15/2005
05:29:01 PM:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; That sounds like an odd way of doing it. &nbsp;Why did you take this<br>
&gt; approach?<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Each DSSU only writes to one tape drive. I have two
tape drives. In order to write to two tape drives at once, i need two separate
DSSU. I don't think a Storage Unit Group would fix that limitation.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>I also have a daily and monthly volume pool. The daily
policy has the Storage unit set to either daily-drive1 or daily-drive2.
The final destination for the Daily DSSU is Daily volume pool(similarly
for the monthend).</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>That's how i came up with 4.</tt></font>
<br>
--=_alternative 004C6CC58625707E_=--