--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> [2004-12-30 12:46]:
> Using inline copy should be more efficient than taking the backup then
> running bpduplicate later.
>=20
> Using inline copy, to take a one hour backup, you will use two tape
> drives for one hour =3D 2 "tape drive hours".
>=20
> Using bpduplicate, you would take the original backup (one "tape drive
> hour"), then run the bpduplicate which would use two tape drives for
> another hour, making a total of =3D 3 "tape drive hours".

Unless the original backup was done to a DSTU

--=20
David Rock
david AT graniteweb DOT com

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB02g/MrO4/Yb/xwYRAiVuAKC2ye1UR8relL614XnBkiC+GKwMqgCgx2xJ
pj/ITKP8MuEFtwbXtpdJ7rA=
=MMlq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--