--=====================_80141988==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Personaly I would keep the L700 and just change the drives.
The only library I know of that is better then the L700 is a PowderHorn. It
could be that the SL8500 will be as good as the Powderhorn but let us see
that first.
We use STK9940B drives and they don't come better then that. (except for
STK9840C if you need a fast mounting drive)
If STK9940B's isn't an option I would also go for the LTO2 drive like David
says.
/johnny
At 00:37 26-12-2004 -0200, David Trostli wrote:
>you will have much better throughput with LTO 2 than with DLT8000. While
>DLT8000 gives 8MB/sec, LTO 2 will give you 50MB/sec
>
>David
>-----Mensagem original-----
>De: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]Em nome de Steven Jenner
>Enviada em: quarta-feira, 24 de novembro de 2004 07:33
>Para: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Tape library change
>
>Hi, I am looking at replacing the tape library within my managed server
>environment and was looking for some opinions on the choices. Currently I
>am using a StorageTek L700 with DLT8000 drives and I am looking at
>replacing it with the ADIC Scalar i2000 with LTO gen 2 drives.
>I would be grateful for any information regarding the two system choices
>in particular the ADIC i2000 as I have no previous experience with this model.
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Steve.
>
--=====================_80141988==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
Personaly I would keep the L700 and just change the drives.<br>
The only library I know of that is better then the L700 is a PowderHorn.
It could be that the SL8500 will be as good as the Powderhorn but let us
see that first.<br><br>
We use STK9940B drives and they don't come better then that. (except for
STK9840C if you need a fast mounting drive)<br><br>
If STK9940B's isn't an option I would also go for the LTO2 drive like
David says.<br><br>
/johnny<br><br>
At 00:37 26-12-2004 -0200, David Trostli wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2
color="#0000FF">you
will have much better throughput with LTO 2 than with DLT8000. While
DLT8000 gives 8MB/sec, LTO 2 will give you 50MB/sec</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#0000FF">David</font>
<dl><font face="tahoma" size=2>
<dd>-----Mensagem original-----
<dd>De:</b> veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[<a href="mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
eudora="autourl">mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</a>]Em
nome de </b>Steven Jenner
<dd>Enviada em:</b> quarta-feira, 24 de novembro de 2004 07:33
<dd>Para:</b> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
<dd>Assunto:</b> [Veritas-bu] Tape library change<br><br>
</font><font face="arial" size=2>
<dd>Hi, I am looking at replacing the tape library within my managed
server environment and was looking for some opinions on the choices.
Currently I am using a StorageTek L700 with DLT8000 drives and I am
looking at replacing it with the ADIC Scalar i2000 with LTO gen 2 drives.
</font><font face="arial" size=2>
<dd>I would be grateful for any information regarding the two system
choices in particular the ADIC i2000 as I have no previous experience
with this model.</font><font face="arial" size=2>
<dd>Thanks in advance,</font> <br><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>
<dd>Steve.</font> <br><br>
</dl></blockquote></html>
--=====================_80141988==_.ALT--
|
