Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Tape SANs and dedicated HBAs

2004-08-10 07:38:39
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Tape SANs and dedicated HBAs
From: Mark.Snow AT aseriti DOT com (Mark.Snow AT aseriti DOT com)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:38:39 +0100
We use Dual ported HBAs, one port for tape one port for disk, our library
and disk array vendoe suggested this configuration. We also use Veritas DMP
with these hosts and it works fine


Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:59:13 +0100
From: "Paul Esson" <paul.esson AT redstor DOT com>
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Tape SANs and dedicated HBAs

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C47EC0.B0BF5F4D
Content-Type: text/plain;
           charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks,
=20
I would like to know from fellow subscribers how many folks are using
dedicated HBAs for tape versus shared HBAs for disk and tape in SAN
environments.  I am being told by a major library vendor that despite
having dual HBAs in hosts for redundant disk access, I need to install
additional HBAs to access their libraries.  They are suggesting two main
issues:
=20

*          Conflicting requirements in HBA set-up for disk and tape
*          Potential conflict with multipathing/failover software

My proposal would not present multiple paths to a tape drive and my
understanding of the failover software we are proposing to use is that
it is disk specific and would not failover all I/O from one HBA to the
other.
=20
All comments appreciated.
=20
Regards,
=20

Paul Esson
Senior Support Engineer
Redstor Limited

Direct:         +44 (0) 1224 595381
Mobile:         +44 (0) 7766 906514
E-Mail:         paul.esson AT redstor DOT com
Web:            www.redstor.com

REDSTOR LIMITED
Torridon House
73-75 Regent Quay
Aberdeen
UK
AB11 5AR



***********************************************************************************
This message has been sent via the Internet. Internet communications are not 
secure against interception or modification. Aseriti therefore cannot guarantee 
that this message has not been modified in transit, and this message should not 
be viewed as contractually binding.
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this message in error 
please notify the sender and destroy your copies of the message and any 
attached files.
***********************************************************************************
Aseriti is the trading name of Severn Trent Systems Ltd.
Severn Trent Systems Ltd : a member of the Severn Trent Group
Registered in England and Wales Registration No. 2394552


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>