Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] SUN st.conf vs IBM Drivers for LTO2 drives

2004-07-29 08:50:12
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SUN st.conf vs IBM Drivers for LTO2 drives
From: GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com (Greenberg, Katherine A)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:50:12 -0400
We use the IBM driver, however, VERITAS will not support it. Personally,
I find it much easier for configuration and testing to have the IBM
utilities available.

HTH,
Kate


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Coco,
Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD)
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:32 AM
To: Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SUN st.conf vs IBM Drivers for LTO2 drives


All,

        Does anyone know if there is a preference (or requirement) that
would indicate wheather or not we should use the SUN supplied st driver
or the IBMtape driver?  We know that we shouldn't have both online - but
we are undecided which one is best to use.
        
Thank you,
 
 
Samuel J. Coco, STG
Functional Area Manager, ARL
Sr UNIX Administrator
BELL      301 394-1151 DSN 290
CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / (H)443 496-1623
HOME     410 604-2415
Email  scoco AT arl.army DOT mil


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

-----------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you
think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.  Thank you.  Aetna



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>