Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] reliability of SDLT320/600

2004-07-21 04:31:25
Subject: [Veritas-bu] reliability of SDLT320/600
From: Marcus.Blei AT t-systems DOT com (Marcus.Blei AT t-systems DOT com)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:31:25 +0200
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C46EFD.1C242A90
Content-Type: text/plain

Greetings,
 
does anybody have experience as to the reliability of SDLT600 tapes or the 
predecessor model SDLT320 as opposed to LTO-2 ?
 
Regards,
Marcus 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C46EFD.1C242A90
Content-Type: text/html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<TITLE>Nachricht</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=709262908-21072004><FONT face=Arial 
size=2>Greetings,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=709262908-21072004><FONT face=Arial 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=709262908-21072004><FONT face=Arial size=2>does anybody have 
experience as to the reliability of SDLT600 tapes or the predecessor model 
SDLT320 as opposed to LTO-2 ?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>R<SPAN 
class=709262908-21072004>egards,</SPAN><BR>Marcus </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C46EFD.1C242A90--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Veritas-bu] reliability of SDLT320/600, Marcus.Blei AT t-systems DOT com <=