Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?

2004-06-18 11:13:35
Subject: [Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?
From: spe08 AT co.henrico.va DOT us (Spearman, David)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:13:35 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On a Dell 6650 with 2.5 Ghz processors it's 0.25 to 0.5 procs per tape =
drive, 250 MB mem per drive if running W2K.
(from the folks at Dell and Veritas)
=20
David Spearman
County of Henrico, Va.
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca [mailto:Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:07
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?



We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Processor SUN e250 with 512MB of ram.=20

We are not doing multiplexing. We are just writting to both tapes at the =
same time.=20

I'd like to see another 512MB(1GB total) of ram, but it runs ok on =
512MB.=20

1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for a windows system.=20

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 06/17/2004 02:56:54 PM:

> I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives require 1 processor and =BD gig
> of ram each.  Is that a valid set of requirements?  Is their a=20
> better guideline?=20



------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">


<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>On a=20
Dell 6650 with 2.5 Ghz processors it's 0.25 to 0.5 procs per tape drive, =
250 MB=20
mem per drive if running W2K.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>(from=20
the folks at Dell and Veritas)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>David=20
Spearman</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>County=20
of Henrico, Va.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D207351115-18062004><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
  size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =
Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca=20
  [mailto:Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, June 18, =
2004=20
  11:07<BR><B>Cc:</B> =
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:=20
  [Veritas-bu] LTO G2 requirements?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT=20
  face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>We run two LTO2 drives on a Dual Processor =
SUN e250=20
  with 512MB of ram.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>We =
are not=20
  doing multiplexing. We are just writting to both tapes at the same=20
  time.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>I'd like to see =
another=20
  512MB(1GB total) of ram, but it runs ok on 512MB.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT =

  face=3Dsans-serif size=3D2>1/1G seems high, but maybe that's for a =
windows=20
  system.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT=20
  size=3D2><TT>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on =
06/17/2004=20
  02:56:54 PM:<BR><BR>&gt; I read somewhere that Gen 2 LTO drives =
require 1=20
  processor and =BD gig<BR>&gt; of ram each. &nbsp;Is that a valid set =
of=20
  requirements? &nbsp;Is their a <BR>&gt; better guideline?</TT></FONT>=20
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C45546.D35E2DE8--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>