[Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server
2004-05-04 17:41:38
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server |
From: |
JSimon AT reliant DOT com (Simon, John) |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2004 16:41:38 -0500 |
Yep, works fine with VCS. What do you want to know?
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]On Behalf Of Robison,
Anthony B. (NGIT)
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 3:24 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server
Has anyone tried to deploy a Netbackup master server in a cluster. In other
words a failover for the Master server?
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]On Behalf Of David Chapa
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 2:48 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Mike Day
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Tape contents determining factor ... Similar
retention periods .. . or just space and same volume pool?
If you are seeing mixed retention periods on your media, check your
bp.conf file to ensure that the ALLOW_MULTIPLE_RETENTIONS_PER_MEDIA is
NOT there.
As far as your situation Ed, I'd verify your vault profile's selection
criteria to make sure it hasn't changed accidentally. I'd also run a
sample output of the criteria by using bpduplicate with the -PM option
at the end. This will tell you what would be "grabbed" for the vaulting
process based on your vault profile criteria.
HTH
Chapa
David A. Chapa * Technical Advisor * ADIC * 720.249.5836 * 720.272.8452
cell * david.chapa AT adic DOT com
HIGH PERFORMANCE, SCALABLE, RELIABLE - http://www.adic.com/gopathlightvx
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 5:20 PM
To: Mike Day
Cc: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape contents determining factor ... Similar
retention periods .. . or just space and same volume pool?
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 03:46:49PM -0700, Mike Day wrote:
> What's the determining factor as to which tape is used for a backup?
>
> I've always been under the impression that tapes contain data from
similar
> retention periods and same expiration dates. I've been looking at the
> 'Images on Media' reports and have noticed that it varies for
retention
> periods (mixed at times) and expiration dates (inconsistent) but
definitely
> the same volume pool.
I thought I had a clue but 5.0 is throwing me for a loop. A recent
vault run listed the images on a single tape that really stunned me. It
was a mix of images from different volume pools from different media
servers, and some of the images should have already expired. How it
came up with that beats me...
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|