Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and server N ICand switch settings

2004-03-18 10:55:01
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and server N ICand switch settings
From: scoco AT arl.army DOT mil (Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD))
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:55:01 -0500
We have that - -  let me finish my current emails and I'll get it out to
you.

Thank you,
 
 
Samuel J. Coco, STG
Functional Area Manager, ARL
Sr UNIX Administrator
BELL      301 394-1151 DSN 290
CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / (H)443 496-1623
HOME     410 604-2415
Email  scoco AT arl.army DOT mil


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Jennifer
C. Green
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:48 AM
To: Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD); Paul Boatman;
Dwayne.Brzozowski AT mail.va DOT gov; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and
server N ICand switch settings


Does anyone have any info on this with Gig cards - they only have Auto,
there are no other options.  Veritas does not recommend Auto but in this
case there is no choice.  This is a windows environment and I am seeing
the same thing - but interesting that this started happening when
upgrading from 3.4.1 to 4.5 - has anyone seen this?

I am at my wits end and dont know how to solve.  Veritas does have some
ways of testing network without NBU involved to show that it is not NBU
but then what do I tell the network guys?

Thanks for the dialougue, this is mostly helpful.

Jennifer
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD)" <scoco AT arl.army DOT mil>
To: "Paul Boatman" <boatm005 AT groupwise.umn DOT edu>;
<Dwayne.Brzozowski AT mail.va DOT gov>; <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and
server N ICand switch settings


> YES !!!  - - - >
>
>   Here at ARL (Army Research Lab), we had the same issues.   Once we
> demonstrated the variances and the networking team verified our claims

> using checkpoint and other tools - the entire organization now 'hard 
> sets' the majority of our connections.
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Samuel J. Coco, STG
> Functional Area Manager, ARL
> Sr UNIX Administrator
> BELL      301 394-1151 DSN 290
> CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / (H)443 496-1623
> HOME     410 604-2415
> Email  scoco AT arl.army DOT mil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Paul 
> Boatman
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:33 AM
> To: Dwayne.Brzozowski AT mail.va DOT gov; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn 
> DOT edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and 
> server N ICand switch settings
>
>
> I work at the 6th largest university in the country.  About 1 year 
> ago, the entire university was required to switch to AUTO-AUTO across 
> ALL platforms because of  network infrastructure changes ("eek !").  
> The impact on Veritas Netbackup has been ridiculous.  Our drives are 
> sitting here getting 10%-20% thruput, and our capacity is maxed out 
> when it shouldn't be.  Tape management and load balancing between 2 
> robots (1 of which is maxed out tape-wise, the other is maxed out 
> drive-wise)  is a nightmare.  Upper management is blaming the 
> software, scheduler, and drive technology claiming that they are not 
> sufficient.
>
> Is anyone else in a similar situation ?
>
> What are the "settings that work" Dwayne ?  I am very interested. 
> Maybe we could present this info to our Network / Telecom guys.  By 
> the way Dwayne, I am a veteran so I sure do appreciate you guys in the

> VA.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> >>> "Biller, Tim" <Tim.Biller AT uk.experian DOT com> 3/18/2004 02:55:30 >>>
> Hi Cheryl,
>
> Have the Network Admins lock the switch port speed to 100Mbit and Full

> Duplex and make sure the client NIC is set exactly the same on ALL the

> servers.  The Unix boxes will need setting explicitly as Mark says, 
> and a file added to ensure they stay that way after a reboot.  (Your 
> sysadmins should know this....)
>
> Most network switches always auto-negotiate to the lowest possible 
> speed so it's essential to lock this down.  Any decent network admin 
> should know this....
>
> Are you running on a dedicated backup LAN? If there's no impact on 
> other systems there's absolutely no reason not to max out the ports 
> and NICs.
>
>
> I'm not aware of any specific documentation that states that 100/Full 
> should be used but if performance sucks under autoneg and it flies 
> under 100/Full then there's your argument.  What tape drives are you 
> using? Are you using SSO?
>
> Cheers - Tim
>
>
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:03:10 -0700
> From: "King, Cheryl" <cheryl.king AT intrado DOT com>
> To: "Veritas-Bu \(E-mail\)" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and 
> server NIC and switch settings
>
> Over and over again we have problems with poor performance with new 
> client backups and restores.  Is there a document that says what the 
> NIC settings should be for each client type?  For example we have 
> highest speed possible for all of them, half duplex for HP, and full 
> duplex for everything else, I think (I haven't checked every system 
> and wasn't here when some were implemented).  Setting Auto detect on 
> the switch seems to not work correctly
> (causes slow performance).   I think the switches are set to match the
> server, but have no way to verify that.  I'd like to be able to 
> present an official document to the System Administrators and the 
> Network Engineers that states the correct configuration requirements.

> Does Veritas have such a document or statement?
>
> Is this a problem in other environments?  Is this just an issue in 
> Veritas Backup environments?  Are my SAs and Network Engineers not 
> following some
> industry, standard, best-practices?    I've been in IT for many years
> but
> working with Veritas NBU for 1 year.  I don't recall ever having 
> network issues like this before.
>
> NBU 4.5 FP5 Solaris 8 Master/Media
> Clients OSF1_V5, HP-UX 11.00, HP-UX10.20, Windows2000, WindowsNT, 
> RedHat2.4, RedHat 2.2, Solaris8, Solaris7.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheryl King
>
>
> From: "Donaldson, Mark" <Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com>
> To: "'King, Cheryl'" <cheryl.king AT intrado DOT com>,
>    "Veritas-Bu (E-mail)"
> <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Is there an official document of client and 
> serv er NIC and switch settings
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:31:48 -0700
>
> The network settings are outside Netbackup control.
>
> You should always set to your highest possible speeds.  For many 
> server/switch combinations, auto-negotiation fails to negotiate the 
> highest settings and they must often be forced to the best setting 
> using ndd or similar utilities.
>
> Half-duplex performance stinks - are you sure that's what only what HP

> can do?
>
> Your network person should be able to query a smart-enough switch for 
> the switch port settings, the SA should be able to query the ethernet 
> port for the same settings.
>
>
> This e-mail has come from Experian International: winner of the UK's 
> National Business of the Year Award 2003.
>
> ======================================================================
> ==
> ==
> Information in this e-mail and any attachments are confidential, and
may
>
> not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor 
> disclosed
>
> to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to 
> create any legally binding contract or other binding commitment 
> through
>
> the use of this electronic communication unless it is issued in 
> accordance with the Experian Limited standard terms and conditions of 
> purchase or
>
> other express written agreement between Experian Limited and the 
> recipient Experian Limited (registration number 653331) Registered 
> office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG80 1TH
>
> Although Experian has taken reasonable steps to ensure that this 
> communication and any attachments are free from computer virus, you 
> are advised to take
> your own steps to ensure that they are actually virus free.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
> This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for viruses. EAS - 
> Systems Support, OIT, University of Minnesota
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>