Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] reducing backup tapes

2003-02-18 11:16:24
Subject: [Veritas-bu] reducing backup tapes
From: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:16:24 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D769.14FEB550
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

What are you backing up?  If you're inadvertantly backing-up database files,
the incremental backup will very close to a full backup - Usually it's not
functionally restorable, either. 

Have you considered differential incrementals?  Those'll save even more
tape.

-M

-----Original Message-----
From: Sen [mailto:discussion.groups AT gmx DOT net]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:31 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] reducing backup tapes


Hi,
My data size is about 100GB and i am scheduling culmulative incremental
backup on weekdays and full backup on weekends to reduce tapes usage...
However, i found that culmulative incremental backup is using the same
amount of tapes as full backup?
pls help.
thanks


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D769.14FEB550
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] reducing backup tapes</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>What are you backing up?&nbsp; If you're =
inadvertantly backing-up database files, the incremental backup will =
very close to a full backup - Usually it's not functionally restorable, =
either. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Have you considered differential incrementals?&nbsp; =
Those'll save even more tape.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-M</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Sen [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:discussion.groups AT gmx DOT net">mailto:[email protected]=
et</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:31 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: [Veritas-bu] reducing backup tapes</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hi,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>My data size is about 100GB and i am scheduling =
culmulative incremental</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>backup on weekdays and full backup on weekends to =
reduce tapes usage...</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>However, i found that culmulative incremental backup =
is using the same</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>amount of tapes as full backup?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>pls help.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>thanks</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT =
SIZE=3D2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; =
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2><A =
HREF=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu"; =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas=
-bu</A></FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D769.14FEB550--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>