Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Fault in "bpschedreq -predict" ??

2002-09-24 19:07:50
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fault in "bpschedreq -predict" ??
From: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:07:50 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2641F.34992250
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

Based on a recent thread on this list, I've been looking into bpschedreq
-predict.

It seems that it'll report only the next occurance of a client & class for
the given supplied date. If I set a date out a couple of days, the list is
almost no different than the date set for the end of tomorrow.

Once a Class/client combination is discovered, the bpschedreq command looks
no further for repeat instances.  My hourly archived-redo log incrementals
are reported once.

This is v3.4.  Does v4.5 work the same?  Anybody have a work-around?

-M

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2641F.34992250
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Fault in &quot;bpschedreq -predict&quot; ??</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Based on a recent thread on this list, I've been =
looking into bpschedreq -predict.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>It seems that it'll report only the next occurance of =
a client &amp; class for the given supplied date. If I set a date out a =
couple of days, the list is almost no different than the date set for =
the end of tomorrow.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Once a Class/client combination is discovered, the =
bpschedreq command looks no further for repeat instances.&nbsp; My =
hourly archived-redo log incrementals are reported once.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>This is v3.4.&nbsp; Does v4.5 work the same?&nbsp; =
Anybody have a work-around?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-M</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2641F.34992250--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>