Veritas bought Bare Metal Restore a while ago, and it works even better
than the IDR, as long as you are going to the same hardware. Right now,
they say they are working on a "dissimilar hardware" BMR release that is
supposed to be out sometime later this year. It's pricey, but may be
worth it if they can get it to work on different hardware.
Bob Grabbe
Dominos Pizza LLC
734-930-3703
Fax 734-669-3703
grabbeb AT dominos DOT com
>>> Kyle Adamski <kylea AT firstlogic DOT com> 8/14/02 3:54:05 PM >>>
This brings up a topic that we have been looking into lately. We have
had
great results when using IDR to recover MS systems on the same
hardware,
however when trying to recover to different hardware has been painful.
Typically we would need to rebuild the OS, re-install all applications
(to
capture the registry settings), then restore any data from backups (SQL
db,
config files, etc.). This would be especially unbearable if one of
our
terminal servers that has 50 + applications running on it went
belly-up.
Is there anything out there that would make recovering a system to
non-like
hardware less of a head ache? Or are we stuck with this method until
M$
changes the way the system state/registry is handled?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
Kyle A. Adamski
-----Original Message-----
From: Spearman, David [mailto:spe08 AT co.henrico.va DOT us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:28 PM
To: 'Day, David'; 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Satisfaction level with in an all MS
environment
David,
We run a very mixed shop (MS,SCO,LINUX,AIX) on a W2K master/media setup
with
an STK L700 and 9840 drives. To date I have completely recovered every
imaginable type of MS server, whether they be NT4, W2K, member server
or
Domain Controller. The member servers are especially easy if you use
IDR.
Domain Controllers are really just as easy since SP2 and NBU 3.4.1 and
all
the patches. I have had excellent results backing up our exchange 5.5
server. I can't help you with the SQL part since our DBA's perfer a
different approach than an agent based backup.
David Spearman
County of Henrico, Va.
-----Original Message-----
From: Day, David [mailto:david.day AT sous DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:59 PM
To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Satisfaction level with in an all MS environment
There is a need to standardize on backup software at our remote sites.
Most
are smaller shops with W2K file/print, MS Exchange 5.5 and MS SQL
Server
2000. I've run a Legato on Solaris environment for years which has
been
very good with UNIX, good with MS data files and poor with disaster
recovery
on NT systems.
To date, I don't believe we have ever completely recovered an NT 4.0 or
W2K
server that completely failed but have been able to recover all data
once
the system was completely rebuilt manually. This is even after working
with
Legato tech support to verify our procedures.
I'm very interested in actual satisfaction with Veritas products in an
all
MS shop. There is a very strong interest in BMR on our critical
Solaris and
W2K servers so I'd also appreciate some feedback if you are using this
product.
TIA
David
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
