Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?

2002-07-09 11:51:40
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?
From: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:51:40 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C22760.83BED2E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

I got my information at a Veritas NB 4.5 dog-and-pony show and I asked
specifically about in-line copy and Vault.  If I get two copies in the base
version and more with license then I'll be thrilled.  I do this via script
now.
 
-M

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Steve [mailto:Steve.White AT PacifiCorp DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:49 AM
To: 'Donaldson, Mark'; 'Fabbro, Andrew P'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?


Are you sure about that?  I thought the base product could do a maximum of
two inline copies, each restricted to the same retention whereas the Vault
option provided the ability to do more than two copies, and each one to have
a different retention.
 
I may be recalling this incorrectly.
 
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Donaldson, Mark [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:44 AM
To: 'Fabbro, Andrew P'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?


Just a quick note that a big disappointment to me is that in-line copy is
part of the separately licensed Vault option.  Unfortunately, my company is
not willing to buy the whole product to get this one feature.
 
-M

-----Original Message-----
From: Fabbro, Andrew P [mailto:Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:28 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?


My understanding from NB notes I've read is that 4.5 supports in-line backup
copies.  e.g., you backup a client and write the backup to two tapes at the
same time.  The NB release notes say you can do up to 9 copies at the same
time.
 
Putting additional drives needed, etc. aside for a moment, it seems like it
could be a good way to make offsite/disaster recovery backups without the
hassle of either duplicating tapes (which doesn't scale well) or running
another full backup
for offsite/DR purposes.  I assume one could use Pool A for one copy and
Pool B for another and send Pool B offsite.
 
Some questions:
 

- Has anyone used inline copying?  How well does it work?  
 
- In NB 3.4.x, to use a duplicate of a tape, you need to flip it to the
primary copy.  It's easy enough to script - does NB 4.5 work the same way?
 
- What about shared memory usage?  The calculation for NB 3.4 is number of
data buffers x size of data buffers x number of drives x MPX per drive.  For
a box driving DLT (64512 data buffer size recommended, maybe 64 data
buffers), it's not a major factor - usually not over 128Mb (say, 8 drives at
4 MPX each).  With more recent technologies, you want fatter buffers, more
buffers, and more MPX - easily 512Mb of shared memory, maybe more.  But I
can't imagine all of that is just to drive the tape - some of it is network
buffering, right?  So if I need X kilobytes of shared memory for a tape
drive, do I need X times 2 for two drives doing the same backup in an
in-line backup?  Or is it more like X times 1.5  (or whatever)?
 
Thanks,
 
 
-drew
  fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com <mailto:fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com> 
 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is
unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, please
contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies.


============================================================================
==



------_=_NextPart_001_01C22760.83BED2E0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=237055015-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I got 
my information at a Veritas NB 4.5 dog-and-pony show and I asked specifically 
about in-line copy and Vault.&nbsp; If I get two copies in the base version and 
more with license then I'll be thrilled.&nbsp; I do this via script 
now.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=237055015-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=237055015-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>-M</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> White, Steve 
  [mailto:Steve.White AT PacifiCorp DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 09, 
2002 
  9:49 AM<BR><B>To:</B> 'Donaldson, Mark'; 'Fabbro, Andrew P'; 
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu] 
NB 4.5 
  and Inline Copies?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=359154915-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Are 
  you sure about that?&nbsp; I thought the base product could do a maximum of 
  two inline copies, each restricted to the same retention whereas the Vault 
  option provided the ability to do more than two copies, and each one to have 
a 
  different retention.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=359154915-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
  size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=359154915-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I 
  may be recalling this incorrectly.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=359154915-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
  size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=359154915-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
  size=2>Steve</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
    size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Donaldson, Mark 
    [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, 
July 09, 
    2002 7:44 AM<BR><B>To:</B> 'Fabbro, Andrew P'; 
    veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: 
[Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 
    and Inline Copies?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2>Just a quick note that a big disappointment to me is that in-line 
    copy is part of the separately licensed Vault option.&nbsp; Unfortunately, 
    my company is not willing to buy the whole product to get this one 
    feature.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=381014314-09072002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
    size=2>-M</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
      size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Fabbro, Andrew P 
      [mailto:Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, July 08, 
2002 11:28 
      PM<BR><B>To:</B> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> 
      [Veritas-bu] NB 4.5 and Inline Copies?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>My 
      understanding from NB notes I've read is that 4.5 supports in-line backup 
      copies.&nbsp; e.g., you backup a client and write the backup to two tapes 
      at the same time.&nbsp; The NB release notes say you can do up to 9 
copies 
      at the same time.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>Putting 
      additional drives needed, etc. aside for a moment, it seems like it could 
      be a good way to make offsite/disaster recovery backups without the 
hassle 
      of either duplicating tapes (which doesn't scale well) or running another 
      full backup</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>for 
offsite/DR 
      purposes.&nbsp; I assume one could use Pool A for one copy and Pool B for 
      another and send Pool B offsite.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>Some 
      questions:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>- Has anyone 
      used inline copying?&nbsp; How well does it work?&nbsp; 
      </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>- 
      </SPAN>In NB 3.4.x, to use a duplicate of a tape, you need to flip it to 
      the primary copy.&nbsp; It's easy enough to script - does NB 4.5 work the 
      same way?</FONT></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV></SPAN><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial size=2>- What 
      about shared memory usage?&nbsp; The calculation for NB 3.4 is number of 
      data buffers x size of data buffers x number of drives x MPX per 
      drive.&nbsp; For a box driving DLT (64512 data buffer size recommended, 
      maybe 64 data buffers), it's not a major factor - usually not over 128Mb 
      (say, 8 drives at 4 MPX each).&nbsp; With more recent technologies, you 
      want fatter buffers, more buffers, and more MPX - easily 512Mb of shared 
      memory, maybe more.&nbsp; But I can't imagine all of that is just to 
drive 
      the tape - some of it is network buffering, right?&nbsp; So if I need X 
      kilobytes of shared memory for a tape drive, do I need X times 2 for two 
      drives doing the same backup in an in-line backup?&nbsp; Or is it more 
      like X times 1.5&nbsp; (or whatever)?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2>-drew</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
      <DIV><SPAN class=569531405-09072002><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT 
      color=#0000ff>&nbsp;</FONT><A 
      href="mailto:fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT com">fabbro.andrew AT cnf DOT 
com</A></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN 
      class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=569531405-09072002>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
      
class=569531405-09072002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></SPAN></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
  
<P>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR><BR>This
 
  email is confidential and may be legally privileged.<BR><BR>It is intended 
  solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else, unless 
  expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee, is 
  unauthorized.<BR><BR>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
  copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is 
  prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this 
  email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy all 
  
copies.<BR><BR><BR>==============================================================================<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C22760.83BED2E0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>