[Veritas-bu] Multiple processors, compression in NetBackup
2002-03-29 17:47:13
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Multiple processors, compression in NetBackup |
From: |
gyurchak AT veritas DOT com (Gregg Yurchak) |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:47:13 -0500 |
.................. The only normal reason to turn on software compression
would be if you don't have a very good network between the client and your
media server, and you need to save the bandwidth - say you're backing up a
remote site. Otherwise turning on compression is only likely to make your
backups slower and to make them use more tape...............
[gty]Or, if you were using client encryption. Compressing the data after
it's encrypted isn't going to give a very good result. Compressing on the
client before encrypting would be the only way to save space.
Thanks,
Gregg Yurchak
VERITAS Professional Services
Biloxi, MS
Cell: 228.324.6939
Office: 228.575.6299
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hanson [mailto:steven.hanson AT uwrf DOT edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Gardner, Jesse
Cc: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple processors, compression in NetBackup
The compression is on the client.
My question here is --- why are you turning on compression? Most tape
drives these days do hardware compression - certainly your drives do on
this library.
The only normal reason to turn on software compression would be if you
don't have a very good network between the client and your media server,
and you need to save the bandwidth - say you're backing up a remote
site. Otherwise turning on compression is only likely to make your
backups slower and to make them use more tape.
Gardner, Jesse wrote:
> In preliminary testing of our new NetBackup configuration, we ran a
> class with and without compression. Using compression doubled the time
> it took the class to finish.
>
> The class consists of one client, specifying about 34GB of software
> installation files and hardware drivers to be backed up. The client is
> connected to the media server via TCP/IP ethernet. The media server is
> a dual Xeon 333 with 500mb RAM running Windows 2000, connected via
> fabric SAN switch to an HP Surestore-E library.
>
> Now for the question: Would adding more processors to the media server
> speed up the compression considerably? (or, possibly, is the
> compression done at the client?)
>
> If we should add more processors to the media server, are they
> automatically detected and used by Netbackup 3.4.1, or is there extra
> configuration there?
>
> Thanks!
> Jesse
>
--
Steve Hanson
UW River Falls ITS
715-425-4357
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
|
|