1) Regarding the exclude list, the Exclude List only applies to scheduled
backups. However if the PC client is allowed to start a user initiated
backup, the exclude list is ignored. Frankly, I would like the exclude list
to also apply to the user initiated backups IF the client has an exclude
list already.
Though I cannot find the documentation on it, the Windows pagefile is
automatically excluded since NB v3.1 (I think) so there's no need to add it
to the exclude list. Per a 4/2001 message from François-Xavier Peretmere,
you can see this in the bpbkar log if you activate it:
13/03/01 05:08:31: [1392]: DAT - Filtered FilesNotToBackup Object:
D:\pagefile.sys
2) Also since we use another antivirus product, I would also like a way to
disable the users from mucking with the Virus Protection tab within the NB
gui.
3) Since OTM is not available on Win9x, it would be extremely helpful not to
show a file that was in use as being backed up when there's no chance of
using it after a restore. This especially applies to the Outlook PST file.
If the Outlook PST is open and in use, the NetBackup GUI still shows the
file as being backed up. However, restoring the file will not allow you to
open it no matter what. Even the inbox repair will not fix it. It ends up
being a giant useless file on the tape. In the server logs, the file will
show to be in use and cannot be backed up but the GUI shows it as being
backed up. The GUI needs to reflect an open file as not being backed up on
Win9x systems.
Regards,
Ken Young
Texas Instruments Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT] [mailto:kevin.v.vapiwala AT ssmb DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:01 PM
To: 'Fabbro, Andrew P'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Top 10 Things I Hate About NetBackup
You should add,
Restore progress logging is nowhere near good as backup progress logging.,
the need to have better restore logs.
Kevin Vapiwala
Salomon Smith Barney
Vital Records Group
2nd Floor, Rutherford
Phone: 201-231-0348
Group Line: 201-231-1270
-----Original Message-----
From: Fabbro, Andrew P [mailto:Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:34 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Top 10 Things I Hate About
NetBackup
Entertaining myself here at lunch, I present, in no
particular order...
10. Can't set exclude lists at the master, only at the
client. Very silly.
I would like to exclude, say, /tmp or WIN386.SWP on all
clients in a class
but I can't...instead, I have to make sure the exclude file
is correct on
each client. What a nightmare for large environments. Some
admin adds a
client (that I may not have access to check his setup) and
doesn't set his
exclude list properly. Now I'm chewing tapes for nothing,
or worse, not
backing up something he needs. What was the thinking here?
Particularly
since the raw Class database shows an Exclude field ;)
9. "Use any available media server" doesn't round-robin.
Strange but true -
it works the list of media servers *alphabetically*. If you
have multiple
media servers, then NetBackup will attempt to use all of the
drives on #1,
then go on to #2, etc. If one of the drives in #1 becomes
free, then it'll
use it before going back to #2. So if you have multiple
media servers and
want to distribute the load, it's difficult to do so because
your full tapes
will naturally accumulate in the first (alphabetically
speaking) storage
unit.
8. Can't restart just one stream. If a single stream fails,
you have to
rerun the whole backup job. Blech. Why can't I restart
just that one
stream?
7. The X-windows backup/restore GUI doesn't have a "preview
media required"
feature for a restore. The Java backup/restore GUI doesn't
show you a list
of the backup images. I wish there was one that did both ;)
6. bpinject sucks. I think bpinject is only packaged with
bpvault. The
design is really amazingly bad. The idea is that you can
type "bpinject 2"
and it'll dump the cap from robot 2 into the robot.
However, if that robot
is on another machine, then you need to have root-level
.rhosts access to
it. Oh sure, let me rewrite our site security policy so I
can insert tapes
- har! This is a particularly bad design because you can
use Netbackup's
vmchange to insert the tapes through NetBackup. The only
reason you need
.rhost access is to query the robot - I'm opening my whole
system up just so
you can query the robot!?!?
A better solution is simple:
- write a service on the media server that runs out
of inetd that
reports the status of the robot. Takes
about 100 lines of perl.
- when the bpinject script needs to know what the
status of the
robot is, it can connect to this service
and query the status of the robot, then use vmchange
(vmadd, etc.)
to insert tapes.
5. jnbSA sends the root password in the clear. Come on
people, this is 2002
- how hard would it be to encrypt this?
4. Frequency for hours, days, and weeks...but not months!
How can I do once
a month? I can do every 4 weeks, but that doesn't really
work because
there's an extra week every quarter.
3. Stupid bug - put in a path like
"/somewhere/someplace/blah ". Note the
blanks. Now run a coverage report. Note that this is
reported as
"UNCOVERED". Sheesh. Also, if you put "C:" in a file list,
you'll get only
the "Veritas" folder on C:. If you put "C:\", though, you
get everything.
2. Archive doesn't make two copies, only one. Considering
that you're
blowing the data away from disk, I'd feel better if it was
written to two
tapes, but NetBackup only does one. I wish this was
configurable.
1. It's still better than any other product on the market.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
