Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] SDLT restore problem

2002-01-22 16:56:11
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SDLT restore problem
From: sibley_ken AT accorel DOT com (SIBLEY, Ken R. - ACCOREL)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:56:11 -0600
The platform is Sun, Solaris 2.6
w/ NBU 3.4.1.  I believe the st.conf
entry is correct.

SDLT220 =       1,0x38,0,0x29639,4,0x90,0x91,0x90,0x91,3;
                                
The 2 in 0x29639 is because we are also implementing
SSO for this library which has been installed, but
waiting for restore testing before implementation.

We are backing up and restoring a Solaris 2.6 client
accross the network for this test, but we also have
HP-UX, Linux and NT clients as well.

Ken

Ken Sibley
Sr. Unix Administrator
Accor Economy Lodging
ksibley AT accorel DOT com
469-737-3370

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Kingery [mailto:larry.kingery AT veritas DOT com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:51 PM
> To: SIBLEY, Ken R. - ACCOREL
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SDLT restore problem
> 
> 
> What platform?
> 
> If Sun, do you have the proper st.conf configured?
> 
> SIBLEY, Ken R. - ACCOREL writes:
> > We have installed a STK L180 tape library with
> > 4 SDLT drives.  We finally have the drives writing
> > to tape with a minimum of problems.  Unfortunately
> > now we are trying to run test restores, both
> > filesystem and Informix DB's.  Neither work.
> > Has anyone had a problem with restores and resolved
> > them?  We are working with Veritas, but no 
> > results so far so I was hoping someone here could
> > help.  This is our last step before putting the
> > unit into production.
> > 
> > Ken Sibley
> > Sr. Unix Administrator
> > Accor Economy Lodging
> > ksibley AT accorel DOT com
> > 469-737-3370
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> -- 
> Larry Kingery 
>         ...from the home office in Grand Rapids, Michigan
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>