Fragments don't span tapes.  When it ran off the end of the first
tape, it had to start a new fragment.


=?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter=5FJones?= writes:
> We have a 3 streamed backup that I want to duplicate.
> I issued the bpduplicate command 
> with the -PM option to see which tapes the backup was
> on. I was suprised to find that
> 6 tapes had been used, 2 for each backupid (output
> below).
> 
> 12/03/01 19:01:29 BU_class serverA_adhoc
> serverA_1007406089 serverA 000029 000056
> 12/03/01 19:01:28 BU_class serverA_adhoc
> serverA_1007406088 serverA 000036 000032
> 12/03/01 19:01:27 BU_class serverA_adhoc
> serverA_1007406087 serverA 000044 000020
> 
> I looked through the All Log Entries report and
> discovered that the first tape is fragment
> 1 and the second is fragment 2. The Images on Media
> report for media ID 000044 also seems
> to show this:
> 
> Images on media ID: 000044
> 
> serverA_1007406087 BU_class Full 2 weeks 21 No No
> 17/12/01 19:01:27 1 19549312 Rmed dlt 16 4086808
> krusty 0 000044
> serverA_1007406087 BU_class Full 2 weeks 21 No No                
> 2 25210080 Rmed dlt 1  2         krusty 0 000020
> 
> My question is what is the reason for fragment 1 and
> fragment 2. In out Storage Unit config
> we have maximum fragment size set to 0.
> 
> regards
> 
> Peter Jones
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. 
> Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! 
> The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

-- 
Larry Kingery 
"Gentlemen, at the sound of the harmonica solo you may come out fighting."