On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:39:32PM -0600, John_Wang AT enron DOT net filled up 
my inbox with:
> 
> Inability to pre-emptive schedule.   If the scheduler happens to have an
> incremental and a full backup scheduled for the same day, I would like to have
> the incremental automatically pre-empted as unnecessary since the full would
> cover everything that the incremental would've anyways.
> 

This is supposed to work the way you wish. In fact, the behavior that has been 
told to me by consulting, support, and other users that it is possible to have 
a full, incremental, and diff running at the same time, or on the same day, is 
a bug. While at Vision, I spoke to Mark Winger, who is principle developer of 
the scheduler. He had never heard of this behavior before and is very 
interested in any documented cases being opened as a support call so this bug 
can be worked out.

-- 
"Any man page that includes the words "USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. 
SLIPPERY WHEN WET" means trouble" - Michael Lucas
Joshua Fielden, Senior Systems Administrator and Backups Team Lead
eXcite@Home, Inc. jfielden AT excitecorp DOT com 650-556-3316