[Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO
2000-08-11 14:56:23
parker AT bctm DOT com said:
>The concern is actually not the SAN media server (that DOES use it's
>"local" drives when they're available), but instead the NON-media server
>clients. I simply did not want them using a SAN media server as a
>server.
>
>Anyway, through trial & error, it seems that they'll do "the right
>thing". If the client's classes are set up to use 'Any_available'
>storage unit, and if the storage units are NOT set to 'on demand', the
>clients will not attempt to write through the SAN media server.
>
I'm confused as to why this does/should work?
If we don't set the storage unit to demand only, then any client should be
able to use it to back up, shouldn't it? I understand making a SAN media
server use its own local drives first, thats done using the
MUST_USE_LOCAL_DRIVE option. I can't figure out though how these
servers/storage units get excluded from acting as normal netbackup servers.
--
Andy Steingruebl | e-mail: steingra AT pprd.abbott DOT com
Unix Systems Admin/Programmer | phone: (847) 935-4728
Unix/Network Security | fax: (847) 935-0142
Abbott Laboratories, PPDR&D | post: 100 Abbott Park Road, D472 - AP9A
| Abbott Park, IL 60064-6115
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, parker
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, Keahey , Ricky L ricky . l . keahey
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, parker
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, Skip Farmer cfarmer
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, W . Curtis Preston curtis
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, parker
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO,
Andrew Steingruebl steingra <=
- [Veritas-bu] SAN media servers, SSO, parker
|
|
|