Re: [Networker] Precedence of use - expired or blank tape, in the same pool?
2012-06-07 13:18:21
Good tip. Thank you! I guess I have been getting lucky as of late.
Bryan
Storage/Database Administrator
________________________________________
From: Rick Brode [rick AT brodetraining DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 12:38 PM
To: EMC NetWorker discussion; Bowersock, Bryan
Subject: Re: [Networker] Precedence of use - expired or blank tape, in the same
pool?
Actually, if a volume is marked "read-only" but is also recyclable,
NetWorker can automatically relabel that volume if it needs to (no
appendable volume available). Instead of setting the volume to
"read-only", it is safer to mark it "manual recycle"; this keeps
NetWorker from ever deciding to relablel it on its own.
Rick
On 6/7/2012 10:05 AM, Bowersock, Bryan wrote:
> You could always set the tape volumes you don't want overwritten to a
> "read-only" status - what I am unsure of is if Networker will still see the
> data as expired and recycle it anyway. I have to do that a lot as of late
> because our offsite storage keeps sending back tapes that were sent just a
> week or so before saying their retention period is up - our tape retention is
> 6 months and tapes are returning in 2 weeks. So, under media I will set the
> tape volume to read-only and then add the tape volume to Networker's library,
> and inventory the tape volume(s) so I can check the savesets just to be sure
> they were sent back prematurely. I'm always afraid Networker will grab one
> by mistake, but it's nice to refresh my memory on how it checks for available
> media again. Perhaps I'm just overcautious...
>
>
>
>
> Bryan
> Storage/Database Administrator
>
|
|
|