On 11/1/11 12:43 PM, Charles Weber wrote:
> I have some EXT4 in service, seems fine within it's limitations.
> I generally don't set up FS over 5 TB since I have lots of groups with 
> storage and want parallel backup streams whenever possible.
> Depending on size/use of the FS I might create it with higher agcount for 
> more parallel journalling.

I am using EXT4 where the size of the AFTD is below 16TB myself (it's free with 
Red Hat, so it
makes sense).  I have customers that want to have save sets that are 4TB and 
larger.  So far,
I've been able to push them off (and keep them at 2TB max).  However, the day 
is coming when I
will have to give in and allow 4TB save sets - 10Gb networks will make that 
doable in a 24 hour
period.

-- 
Frank Swasey                    | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator        | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont           |    just like everyone else.
  "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER