There is a RFE for the NMM security issue, I just can't find it right now.  


Also, someone from EMC replied there is a fix coming in a new release.   
However, I find that to be a problem.  It should be a patch for this current 
release, not a new release. 


On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:59 AM, "Joe N. Wallace" <joe.n.wallace AT GMAIL DOT COM> 
wrote:

> It's evident that EMC lost their focus on NetWorker. late Exchange 2010
> support and VADP support are some good examples on how EMC is neglecting
> NetWorker customers. Actually EMC still talks about the Server 2008 DR
> support and the VADP support as "new features", but those features should
> had been out 18 months before it got released. Another example is the
> security model as discussed in the NMM issue thread this week. And what
> scares me the most with that issue, is that EMC does not consider it an
> issue.
> 
> Can't the users of this community not unite in putting pressure on some
> RFE's?
> 
> J.W.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/10/19 STANLEY R. HORWITZ <stan AT temple DOT edu>
> 
>> Paul,
>> 
>> Have you contacted your local EMC account manager to ask to see a NetWorker
>> roadmap?
>> 
>> On Oct 18, 2011, at 3:38 PM, HackNDos wrote:
>> 
>>> Most all of there efforts switched from Networker into their Avamar
>> product.  This was evident with the Exchange 2010 Support.  Typically
>> something that would get released 90 days after a product is released took
>> them 1.5 years to release.  And if you noticed during this same period
>> Avamar had Exchange 2010 support.  In fact our account rep tried to get us
>> to switch from Networker to Avamar.
>>> 
>>> I have been questioning where Networker has been heading since that all
>> started and how much effort is EMC going to keep putting into Networker
>> based on these actions.
>>> 
>>> Someone said do we want a good vs bad product release, I think maybe
>> something more transparent like a roadmap of what they have planned would
>> make plenty of Networker customers happy.
>>> 
>>> Just my thoughts....
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> |This was sent by hackndos AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
>>> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
>> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
>> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
>> this
>> list. You can access the archives at
>> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
>>> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>> 
>> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
>> type
>> "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
>> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
>> this
>> list. You can access the archives at
>> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
>> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>> 
> 
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
> this list. You can access the archives at 
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER