Networker

Re: [Networker] Minimum hardware and VCB Licensing question

2011-04-14 17:16:25
Subject: Re: [Networker] Minimum hardware and VCB Licensing question
From: Chester Martin <cmartin AT SPP DOT ORG>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:14:24 -0500
Good to know I'm not the only one with vcb woes.. :)  

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Michael Leone
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:18 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Minimum hardware and VCB Licensing question

> doesn't work. You are heavily reliant on VSS for it to work well, and 
> I have a very low opinion of VSS too.

My opinion of VSS (especially on Win2003) is definitely R-rated ...

> Avoid VCB at this stage if you can. I speak from personal experience.

I backup each VM as if it was a physical machine, so each is installed as a NW 
client. At least it all works that way ...

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER