George,
Based on the price in the quote I have it looks like they may be a better than
average value for the money. But I don't have any actual experience with them
yet so YMMV.
Dave
Dave Werth
Garmin AT, Inc.
Salem, Oregon
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of George Sinclair
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 1:49 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Qualstar
STANLEY R. HORWITZ wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Francis Swasey wrote:
>
>> Hey, absolutely.
>>
>> I love the Qualstar LTO tape library we have. It's an XLS 832700. We have
>> the one LRM and two
>> MEM1's. When we first got it in 2007, we didn't know whether to trust the
>> library or NetWorker
>> about whether a tape was really in the drive, so we took the cartridge slots
>> off the doors so
>> we could see into the LRM and visually check (without opening the door) what
>> the drive status
>> was. That has been helpful, but the XLS has never lied to me about the
>> status of a tape drive
>> (while NetWorker is periodically confused). Anyway, we have capacity for
>> 2,505 cartridges.
>>
>> The tape library is rock solid, and after much work with EMC, NetWorker
>> solidly supports the
>> library now.
>
> Same here. For the price Qualstar gets for its tape libraries, they are hard
> to beat. I have a Qualstar 88132 model with 4 LTO-3 tape drives. It is a real
> workhorse. We back up roughly 250 clients to it nightly with the four drives
> connected to a Dell 2950 server running Red Hat Linux AS 4 and NetWorker
> 7.5.3. Those four tape drives routinely see 80-90MB/sec throughput, which is
> pretty good considering we only have two network drops on that server and no
> disk-to-disk-to-tape involved.
Stan, where you say "for the price", do you mean that the prices are
reasonable, or minimally competitive, for what you're getting, or the
price is on the higher end but well worth the extra?
Also, what all (say, in a nutshell) was involved in getting it to work
with NW? I thought NW had long supported Qualstar, but maybe your's was
a newer model they'd not yet tested? Just curious.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with
> this list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or
unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any
attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|