Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?
2010-03-19 18:10:04
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:17:15PM +0000, George Sinclair wrote:
> One thing I notice, though, is that that while the 'Volume default
> capacity' field is blank (null) for all the devices, if I check the
> Volume tab, I see that the field: 'Volume current capacity' is set
> to 800 GB for each volume. There's an LTO-4 tape in every drive.
>
> Seems then that it's picking this up automatically? Is there any
> need for me to set the 'Volume default capacity'?
It probably is the default for LTO4. You can also view the capacity for
any tape after labeling with 'mminfo'.
No need to override the default unless you don't like 800G. I often set
mine for a little more just because I did get some amount of consistent
compression. So I'd set it at 1.5x or so.
--
Darren
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Preston de Guise
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?,
A Darren Dunham <=
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Len Philpot
|
|
|