Re: [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?
2010-03-19 17:41:13
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?,...:
I do not think there is a one size fits all answer to your question. It
depends on your employer's requirements and budget. For us, de-dup is
far more important than BMR, although BMR would be nice.
Agreed 100% for us too.
... our requirements tilt toward protecting
application data far more than they do protecting the components of BMR.
That perfectly summarizes our needs too. We can have an OS installed
and configured in a relatively short amount of time. The time it takes
to get back the application data is generally orders of magnitude longer
than the time it takes to get the OS ready.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney Tim.Mooney AT ndsu DOT
edu
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?, tbirkenbach
- Re: [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?, Francis Swasey
- Re: [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?, STANLEY R. HORWITZ
- Re: [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?,
Tim Mooney <=
- [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?, TXDRmgr
- [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?, brerrabbit
|
|
|