[Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?
2010-03-19 11:34:24
Recently I received the "dog and pony" show from EMC on their Data Domain and
Avamar products, which they suggest is the "next step" in progressing my
NetWorker backup solution. I agree with them in that dedup and/or bare metal
recovery (BMR) would be an enhancement to a backup solution. It got me to
thinking...
What do you, as my fellow backup admins, feel is a higher priority, dedup or
BMR?
Personally, I feel that BMR would be the service that I, as a systems admin,
would want from a backup solution. I realize that some products, such as EMC's
Avamar product, can do both BMR and dedup; so you CAN have your cake and eat it
too, but it comes with the EMC sticker shock too...
Just curious as to what others have done or are doing in progressing their
backup solutions. Any shared insight is greatly appreciated.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by tom.birkenbach AT wmich DOT edu via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Backup next step: dedup or BMR, or both?,
tbirkenbach <=
|
|
|