How about FalconStor? You can buy their product as software and install it on
the server/storage of your choice (within their supported system list).
-T
Teresa Biehler
Information and Technology Services
Rochester Institute of Technology
teresa.biehler AT rit DOT edu
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is
intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
destroy any copies of this information.
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of George Sinclair
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:54 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Question on data deduplication products?
Question 1:
Does anyone know if any companies make data deduplication software that
the end user can install on their own RH Linux server as opposed to a
vendor supplied hardware & software (turnkey) solution?
Concern:
We're interested in possibly implementing data duplication in the near
future for the expected cost savings of tape media. Obviously, a
solution involving a vendor's supplied hardware might be better
optimized (I'd hope so) over what we might be able to accomplish
purchasing our own server; however, we're concerned about adding a
'black box' to the network from some vendor wherein we might not have
control over its OS, kernel, patches, etc. We'd much prefer to wipe the
OS and install our own for security compliance, or simply use our own
server and attached disks from scratch, using only the supplied software
from the vendor, assuming it supports our OS and hardware. Is this
possible with any of the commercial players out there?
Question 2:
Assuming we can purchase just the software, how much of a performance
hit might we expect versus a vendor optimized hardware/software solution?
I'm trying to limit this post to the security aspects/risks of vendor's
hardware and not the merits or debates over the various types of
deduplication, e.g. post-process versus in-line, or concerns or
drawbacks of using deduplication in general. I'll save that for another
post. However, if anyone feels this is relevant, then by all means,
chime in.
Thanks.
George
--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or
unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
