Networker

Re: [Networker] Question on data deduplication products?

2010-02-03 14:16:16
Subject: Re: [Networker] Question on data deduplication products?
From: Terry Lemons <lemons_terry AT EMC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:13:25 -0500
Or, check out a highly-successful, widely-used, fully-supported
solution: Avamar.  Which, incidentally, has good integration with
NetWorker.

tl

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of George Sinclair
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:54 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Question on data deduplication products?

Question 1:
Does anyone know if any companies make data deduplication software that 
the end user can install on their own RH Linux server as opposed to a 
vendor supplied hardware & software (turnkey) solution?

Concern:
We're interested in possibly implementing data duplication in the near 
future for the expected cost savings of tape media. Obviously, a 
solution involving a vendor's supplied hardware might be better 
optimized (I'd hope so) over what we might be able to accomplish 
purchasing our own server; however, we're concerned about adding a 
'black box' to the network from some vendor wherein we might not have 
control over its OS, kernel, patches, etc. We'd much prefer to wipe the 
OS and install our own for security compliance, or simply use our own 
server and attached disks from scratch, using only the supplied software

from the vendor, assuming it supports our OS and hardware. Is this 
possible with any of the commercial players out there?

Question 2:
Assuming we can purchase just the software, how much of a performance 
hit might we expect versus a vendor optimized hardware/software
solution?


I'm trying to limit this post to the security aspects/risks of vendor's 
hardware and not the merits or debates over the various types of 
deduplication, e.g. post-process versus in-line, or concerns or 
drawbacks of using deduplication in general. I'll save that for another 
post. However, if anyone feels this is relevant, then by all means, 
chime in.

Thanks.

George


-- 
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or

unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER